BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27991469)

  • 1. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a low intensity intervention to increase hearing protector use among noise-exposed workers.
    McCullagh MC
    Am J Ind Med; 2011 Mar; 54(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 20721900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of the hearing protection assessment (HPA-2) questionnaire.
    Reddy R; Welch D; Ameratunga S; Thorne P
    Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Apr; 64(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 24514576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of hearing protection interventions for farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Ronis DL
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():399. PubMed ID: 25927191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
    Hager LD
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
    Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants of use of hearing protection devices in Canadian lumber mill workers.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19570944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: A randomized controlled trial.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Cohen MA; Yang JJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1(0):S3-12. PubMed ID: 26766172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing protection devices: Use at work predicts use at play.
    Beach EF; Gilliver M; Williams W
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2016 Sep; 71(5):281-288. PubMed ID: 26927729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study.
    Reddy RK; Welch D; Thorne P; Ameratunga S
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):202-9. PubMed ID: 22918151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of Hearing Protection Use Among Industrial Workers.
    Tantranont K; Codchanak N
    Workplace Health Saf; 2017 Aug; 65(8):365-371. PubMed ID: 28422611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kazanis AS; Eakin BL; Hong O; Raymond DM
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 14501543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.
    Meira TC; Santana VS; Ferrite S
    Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():. PubMed ID: 26487294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual perception of noise exposure and hearing protection in industry.
    Arezes PM; Miguel AS
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):683-92. PubMed ID: 16553059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes toward use of hearing protection devices and effects of an intervention on fit-testing results.
    Smith PS; Monaco BA; Lusk SL
    Workplace Health Saf; 2014 Dec; 62(12):491-9. PubMed ID: 25207586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beliefs and attitudes among Swedish workers regarding the risk of hearing loss.
    Svensson EB; Morata TC; Nylén P; Krieg EF; Johnson AC
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):585-93. PubMed ID: 15724523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation of the adjustment of retrospective noise exposure for use of hearing protection devices.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 20237208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of hearing protection behavior among firefighters in the United States.
    Hong O; Chin DL; Ronis DL
    Int J Behav Med; 2013 Mar; 20(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 22161219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception and attitudes of firefighters on noise exposure and hearing loss.
    Hong O; Samo D; Hulea R; Eakin B
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Mar; 5(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 18213534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Farm and rural adolescents' perspective on hearing conservation: reports from a focus group study.
    Rosemberg MA; McCullagh MC; Nordstrom M
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(76):134-40. PubMed ID: 25913552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.