These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27991681)

  • 1. Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use.
    Robillard CM; Kerr JT
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):837-847. PubMed ID: 27991681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Building robust conservation plans.
    Visconti P; Joppa L
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25362995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microtargeting for conservation.
    Metcalf AL; Phelan CN; Pallai C; Norton M; Yuhas B; Finley JC; Muth A
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 30887584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
    Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes.
    Muscatello A; Elith J; Kujala H
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1309-1320. PubMed ID: 33236808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of conservation easements in agricultural regions.
    Braza M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):848-859. PubMed ID: 28218793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
    Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cost metric on cost-effectiveness of protected-area network design in urban landscapes.
    Burkhalter JC; Lockwood JL; Maslo B; Fenn KH; Leu K
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 26395858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
    Habib TJ; Farr DR; Schneider RR; Boutin S
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding variation in impacts from private protected areas across regions and protection mechanisms to inform organizational practices.
    Hagen S; Nolte C; Chang Y; Morgan S; Boccaletti G; Reddy SMW
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14225. PubMed ID: 38328897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conserving biodiversity in production landscapes.
    Wilson KA; Meijaard E; Drummond S; Grantham HS; Boitani L; Catullo G; Christie L; Dennis R; Dutton I; Falcucci A; Maiorano L; Possingham HP; Rondinini C; Turner WR; Venter O; Watts M
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1721-32. PubMed ID: 20945770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape-scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species.
    Ikin K; Tulloch A; Gibbons P; Ansell D; Seddon J; Lindenmayer D
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1027-37. PubMed ID: 27040452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas.
    Karimi A; Tulloch AIT; Brown G; Hockings M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 28425128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in the added conservation value of land protection when prioritizing protected areas.
    Yoon HS; Vijay V; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 35661264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing strategies to reconcile agriculture and bird conservation in the temperate grasslands of South America.
    Dotta G; Phalan B; Silva TW; Green R; Balmford A
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 26400720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.
    Di Minin E; Macmillan DC; Goodman PS; Escott B; Slotow R; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):808-20. PubMed ID: 23565917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protected area planning to conserve biodiversity in an uncertain future.
    Schuster R; Buxton R; Hanson JO; Binley AD; Pittman J; Tulloch V; La Sorte FA; Roehrdanz PR; Verburg PH; Rodewald AD; Wilson S; Possingham HP; Bennett JR
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14048. PubMed ID: 36661081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of agricultural lands for Himalayan birds in winter.
    Elsen PR; Kalyanaraman R; Ramesh K; Wilcove DS
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):416-426. PubMed ID: 27558794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using changes in agricultural utility to quantify future climate-induced risk to conservation.
    Estes LD; Paroz LL; Bradley BA; Green JM; Hole DG; Holness S; Ziv G; Oppenheimer MG; Wilcove DS
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):427-37. PubMed ID: 24372589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.