These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27993786)

  • 1. DeFCoM: analysis and modeling of transcription factor binding sites using a motif-centric genomic footprinter.
    Quach B; Furey TS
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(7):956-963. PubMed ID: 27993786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of computational footprinting methods for DNase sequencing experiments.
    Gusmao EG; Allhoff M; Zenke M; Costa IG
    Nat Methods; 2016 Apr; 13(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 26901649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explicit DNase sequence bias modeling enables high-resolution transcription factor footprint detection.
    Yardımcı GG; Frank CL; Crawford GE; Ohler U
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Oct; 42(19):11865-78. PubMed ID: 25294828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. XL-DNase-seq: improved footprinting of dynamic transcription factors.
    Oh KS; Ha J; Baek S; Sung MH
    Epigenetics Chromatin; 2019 Jun; 12(1):30. PubMed ID: 31164146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducible inference of transcription factor footprints in ATAC-seq and DNase-seq datasets using protocol-specific bias modeling.
    Karabacak Calviello A; Hirsekorn A; Wurmus R; Yusuf D; Ohler U
    Genome Biol; 2019 Feb; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 30791920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bivariate Genomic Footprinting Detects Changes in Transcription Factor Activity.
    Baek S; Goldstein I; Hager GL
    Cell Rep; 2017 May; 19(8):1710-1722. PubMed ID: 28538187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of transcription factor binding sites using ATAC-seq.
    Li Z; Schulz MH; Look T; Begemann M; Zenke M; Costa IG
    Genome Biol; 2019 Feb; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 30808370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of coupling DNA motif pairs on long-range chromatin interactions in human K562 cells.
    Wong KC; Li Y; Peng C
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 26411866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TRACE: transcription factor footprinting using chromatin accessibility data and DNA sequence.
    Ouyang N; Boyle AP
    Genome Res; 2020 Jul; 30(7):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 32660981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic Footprinting Analyses from DNase-seq Data to Construct Gene Regulatory Networks.
    Moyano TC; Gutiérrez RA; Alvarez JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2328():25-46. PubMed ID: 34251618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Most brain disease-associated and eQTL haplotypes are not located within transcription factor DNase-seq footprints in brain.
    Handel AE; Gallone G; Zameel Cader M; Ponting CP
    Hum Mol Genet; 2017 Jan; 26(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 27798116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNase footprint signatures are dictated by factor dynamics and DNA sequence.
    Sung MH; Guertin MJ; Baek S; Hager GL
    Mol Cell; 2014 Oct; 56(2):275-285. PubMed ID: 25242143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncovering uncharacterized binding of transcription factors from ATAC-seq footprinting data.
    Schultheis H; Bentsen M; Heger V; Looso M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9275. PubMed ID: 38654130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of active transcription factor binding sites with the combination of DNase hypersensitivity and histone modifications.
    Gusmao EG; Dieterich C; Zenke M; Costa IG
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 30(22):3143-51. PubMed ID: 25086003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TAMC: A deep-learning approach to predict motif-centric transcriptional factor binding activity based on ATAC-seq profile.
    Yang T; Henao R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Sep; 18(9):e1009921. PubMed ID: 36094959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-resolution mapping of in vivo genomic transcription factor binding sites using in situ DNase I footprinting and ChIP-seq.
    Chumsakul O; Nakamura K; Kurata T; Sakamoto T; Hobman JL; Ogasawara N; Oshima T; Ishikawa S
    DNA Res; 2013 Aug; 20(4):325-38. PubMed ID: 23580539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors.
    Wang J; Zhuang J; Iyer S; Lin X; Whitfield TW; Greven MC; Pierce BG; Dong X; Kundaje A; Cheng Y; Rando OJ; Birney E; Myers RM; Noble WS; Snyder M; Weng Z
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1798-812. PubMed ID: 22955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Romulus: robust multi-state identification of transcription factor binding sites from DNase-seq data.
    Jankowski A; Tiuryn J; Prabhakar S
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 32(16):2419-26. PubMed ID: 27153645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heterodimeric DNA motif synthesis and validations.
    Wong KC; Lin J; Li X; Lin Q; Liang C; Song YQ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):1628-1636. PubMed ID: 30590725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.