These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27994314)
21. Microtensile Bond Strength Evaluation of Composite Resin to Discolored Dentin After Amalgam Removal. Mandava J; Pamidimukkala S; Karumuri S; Ravi R; Borugadda R; Afraaz A Cureus; 2020 Apr; 12(4):e7536. PubMed ID: 32377484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. García Marí L; Climent Gil A; LLena Puy C Dent Mater J; 2019 Oct; 38(5):721-727. PubMed ID: 31231103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment. Bicalho AA; de Souza SJ; de Rosatto CM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Volumetric Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Composites in Class II Cavities. Algamaiah H; Sampaio CS; Rigo LC; Janal MN; Giannini M; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Reis AF; Hirata R J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Apr; 29(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 27925387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The bond strength of highly filled flowable composites placed in two different configuration factors. Sagsoz O; Ilday NO; Karatas O; Cayabatmaz M; Parlak H; Olmez MH; Demirbuga S J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 26957788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adhesiveness of bulk-fill composite resin in permanent molars submitted to Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Fidalgo TKDS; Americano G; Medina D; Athayde G; Letieri ADS; Maia LC Braz Oral Res; 2019; 33():e111. PubMed ID: 31800863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors affecting marginal integrity of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations. Savadi Oskoee S; Bahari M; Jafari Navimipour E; Ajami AA; Ghiasvand N; Savadi Oskoee A J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2017; 11(2):101-109. PubMed ID: 28748051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of different gingival margin restorations of class II cavities on microleakage: an in-vitro study. Mahrous AI; Eltiti HA; Ahmed IM; Alagha EI Electron Physician; 2015 Nov; 7(7):1435-40. PubMed ID: 26767095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques. Fahmy AE; Farrag NM J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of different placement techniques on the microtensile bond strength of low-shrink silorane composite bonded to Class I cavities. Almeida e Silva JS; Rolla JN; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):e233-7. PubMed ID: 22313929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of Thermocycling, Degree of Conversion, and Cavity Configuration on the Bonding Effectiveness of All-in-One Adhesives. El-Damanhoury HM; Gaintantzopoulou M Oper Dent; 2015; 40(5):480-91. PubMed ID: 25748210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites. Jung JH; Park SH Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microleakage in Sub-Gingival Class II Preparations Restored Using Two Different Liners for Open Sandwich Technique Supplemented With or Without Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Study. Gyanani HC; Chhabra N; Shah NC; Jais PS J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):ZC70-3. PubMed ID: 27135006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of fiber reinforcement on adaptation and bond strength of a bulk-fill composite in deep preparations. Sadr A; Bakhtiari B; Hayashi J; Luong MN; Chen YW; Chyz G; Chan D; Tagami J Dent Mater; 2020 Apr; 36(4):527-534. PubMed ID: 32044045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of cervical marginal and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: An in vitro study. Agarwal RS; Hiremath H; Agarwal J; Garg A J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 25657529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Direct Class II Composite Restorations Made of Different "Low-Shrinkage" Systems. Shahidi C; Krejci I; Dietschi D Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):273-283. PubMed ID: 28467259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Aranha AC; Pimenta LA Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidine, grape seed extract, riboflavin/chitosan modification on microtensile bond strength of composite resin to dentin after polymerase chain reaction thermocycling: An Gajjela RS; Satish RK; Sajjan GS; Varma KM; Rambabu T; Vijaya Lakshmi BH J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 28855760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]