These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27994314)

  • 41. Influence of composite insertion technique on gap formation.
    Kapoor N; Bahuguna N; Anand S
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 26957799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative evaluation of 3 microbond strength tests using 4 adhesive systems: Mechanical, finite element, and failure analysis.
    Campos RE; Santos Filho PCF; de O Júnior OB; Ambrosano GMB; Pereira CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):166-174. PubMed ID: 28478987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin.
    Van Ende A; De Munck J; Van Landuyt KL; Poitevin A; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2013 Mar; 29(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 23228335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Internal and marginal adaptation of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites in class II cavities placed with different adhesive strategies.
    Haak R; Näke T; Park KJ; Ziebolz D; Krause F; Schneider H
    Odontology; 2019 Jul; 107(3):374-382. PubMed ID: 30569286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays.
    Da Silva Gonçalves D; Cura M; Ceballos L; Fuentes MV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):247-254. PubMed ID: 26969499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
    Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of fiber inserts, type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
    Dhingra V; Taneja S; Kumar M; Kumari M
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 23802641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques.
    Gamarra VSS; Borges GA; Júnior LHB; Spohr AM
    Odontology; 2018 Jan; 106(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 28160094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluating Resin-Dentin Bond by Microtensile Bond Strength Test: Effects of Various Resin Composites and Placement Techniques.
    Moosavi H; Maleknejad F; Forghani M; Afshari E
    Open Dent J; 2015; 9():409-13. PubMed ID: 26966466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites.
    Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):65-72. PubMed ID: 18997918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.
    Tavangar M; Zohri Z; Sheikhnezhad H; Shahbeig S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):867-873. PubMed ID: 28989122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In vitro microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations.
    Loguercio AD; de Oliveira Bauer JR; Reis A; Grande RH
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jan; 35(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14765638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation.
    Fronza BM; Makishi P; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Sumi Y; Tagami J; Giannini M
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Aug; 32():e80. PubMed ID: 30088553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Marginal adaptation and internal indentation resistance of a Class II bulk-fill resin-based composite.
    El Naga MA; Qian F; Denehy GE; Quock RL; Armstrong SR
    Am J Dent; 2020 Jun; 33(3):145-150. PubMed ID: 32470240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strengths of total and self-etching adhesive systems.
    Mitsui FH; Peris AR; Cavalcanti AN; Marchi GM; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 16827028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: in vitro study.
    Orłowski M; Tarczydło B; Chałas R
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():701262. PubMed ID: 25874254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.