These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995071)

  • 1. Minimum statistical standards for submissions to Neuroimage: Clinical.
    Roiser JP; Linden DE; Gorno-Tempinin ML; Moran RJ; Dickerson BC; Grafton ST
    Neuroimage Clin; 2016; 12():1045-1047. PubMed ID: 27995071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have.
    Mertens S; Baethge C
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Dec; 109(51-52):900-2. PubMed ID: 23372614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proposed standards for medical education submissions to the Journal of General Internal Medicine.
    Cook DA; Bowen JL; Gerrity MS; Kalet AL; Kogan JR; Spickard A; Wayne DB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 23(7):908-13. PubMed ID: 18612716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research.
    Moher D; Simera I; Schulz KF; Hoey J; Altman DG
    BMC Med; 2008 Jun; 6():13. PubMed ID: 18558004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tackling waste in publishing through portable peer review.
    Bell GP; Kvajo M
    BMC Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):146. PubMed ID: 30558673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards.
    Gordon SE
    J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache.
    Hesterman CM; Szperka CL; Turner DP
    Headache; 2018 Nov; 58(10):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 30011058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we trust peer-reviewed science?
    Gyles C
    Can Vet J; 2014 Feb; 55(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 24489388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The matter of standards. III. The editorial process.
    Wilkins AS
    Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1037-9. PubMed ID: 18937297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Science in flux: Registered reports and beyond at the European Journal of Neuroscience.
    Chambers CD; Forstmann B; Pruszynski JA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 49(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 30584679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publishing coronavirology: Peering into peer(less?) review.
    Pederson T
    FASEB J; 2020 Aug; 34(8):9825-9827. PubMed ID: 32803811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leading the way: guidance to quality scientific reporting.
    Nelson CJ; Roberts J
    J Sex Med; 2010 Jun; 7(6):1983-1984. PubMed ID: 20929510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The hidden work of a journal editor.
    Kearney MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2018 Feb; 41(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 29360181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editors, reviewers and the work of the editorial board.
    Foster A
    Vet Dermatol; 2013 Oct; 24(5):477-8. PubMed ID: 24025019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
    Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2019 Feb; 2(1):e1150. PubMed ID: 32721132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review comes under peer review.
    Sun M
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):910-2. PubMed ID: 2727683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Importance of Publishing Negative Results.
    Weintraub PG
    J Insect Sci; 2016; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 27773876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical journal apologizes for violating own standards.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 2000 Feb; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11873786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research.
    Morris C
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Oct; 50(10):723. PubMed ID: 18834380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transparent reporting of research results in eLife.
    Teare MD
    Elife; 2016 Sep; 5():. PubMed ID: 27612386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.