BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995101)

  • 1. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional Papanicolaou smears in cervical dysplasia diagnosis.
    Haghighi F; Ghanbarzadeh N; Ataee M; Sharifzadeh G; Mojarrad JS; Najafi-Semnani F
    Adv Biomed Res; 2016; 5():162. PubMed ID: 27995101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Efficiency of Cervical Pap and Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology: A Review.
    Dasgupta S
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48343. PubMed ID: 38060751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Papanicolaou Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening: An Experience From Pakistan.
    Hashmi AA; Naz S; Ahmed O; Yaqeen SR; Irfan M; Asif MG; Kamal A; Faridi N
    Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12293. PubMed ID: 33520497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar.
    Pankaj S; Nazneen S; Kumari S; Kumari A; Kumari A; Kumari J; Choudhary V; Kumar S
    Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 30147099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of conventional cytology and a low-cost liquid-based cytology technique, EziPREP™, for cervicovaginal smear reporting: A split sample study.
    Gupta R; Yadav R; Sharda A; Kumar D; Sandeep ; Mehrotra R; Gupta S
    Cytojournal; 2019; 16():22. PubMed ID: 31803248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Patel N; Bavikar R; Buch A; Kulkarni M; Dharwadkar A; Viswanathan V
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37416097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
    Sigurdsson K
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting uterine glandular lesions: Role of cervical cytology.
    Bansal B; Gupta P; Gupta N; Rajwanshi A; Suri V
    Cytojournal; 2016; 13():3. PubMed ID: 27014363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Samples from Conventional Smear versus Liquid-Based Cytology in Uterine Cervical Cancer Screening Test.
    Jeong H; Hong SR; Chae SW; Jin SY; Yoon HK; Lee J; Kim EK; Ha ST; Kim SN; Park EJ; Jung JJ; Sung SH; Lim SC
    J Pathol Transl Med; 2017 May; 51(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 28415159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
    Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.
    Karnon J; Peters J; Platt J; Chilcott J; McGoogan E; Brewer N
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 May; 8(20):iii, 1-78. PubMed ID: 15147611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of PAP smear and liquid based cytology as a screening method for cervical carcinoma.
    Khakwani M; Parveen R; Azhar M
    Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(7):1827-1831. PubMed ID: 36246719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Shandon PapSpin liquid-based gynecological test: A split-sample and direct-to-vial test with histology follow-up study.
    Rimiene J; Petronyte J; Gudleviciene Z; Smailyte G; Krasauskaite I; Laurinavicius A
    Cytojournal; 2010 Mar; 7():2. PubMed ID: 20376176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
    Dowie R; Stoykova B; Crawford D; Desai M; Mather J; Morgan K; Shirt M
    Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: experience from the first 1000 split samples.
    Singh VB; Gupta N; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Suri V; Rajwanshi A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015; 58(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25673585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of papanicolaou smear and human papillomavirus (HPV) test as cervical screening tools: can we rely on HPV test alone as a screening method? An 11-year retrospective experience at a single institution.
    Kang M; Ha SY; Cho HY; Chung DH; Kim NR; An J; Lee S; Seok JY; Jeong J
    J Pathol Transl Med; 2020 Jan; 54(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 31964113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Analysis of Conventional Cytology and Liquid-Based Cytology in the Detection of Carcinoma Cervix and its Precursor Lesions.
    Maheshwari Y; Handa U; Aggarwal P; Goel B
    J Cytol; 2023; 40(3):114-118. PubMed ID: 37745808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can LBC Completely Replace Conventional Pap Smear in Developing Countries.
    Kamineni V; Nair P; Deshpande A
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2019 Feb; 69(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 30814813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative analysis of conventional and SurePath liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: A study of 140 cases.
    Sharma J; Toi PCh; Siddaraju N; Sundareshan M; Habeebullah S
    J Cytol; 2016; 33(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 27279683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
    Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.