197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995137)
21. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load.
Bataineh K; Al Janaideh M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 31670872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Study and characterization of the crest module design: A 3D finite element analysis.
Costa C; Peixinho N; Silva JP; Carvalho S
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 25794909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Consequences of Peri-Implant Bone Loss in the Occlusal Load Transfer to the Supporting Bone in terms of Magnitude of Stress, Strain, and Stress Distribution: A Finite Element Analysis.
Pérez-Pevida E; Chávarri-Prado D; Diéguez-Pereira M; Estrada-Martínez A; Montalbán-Vadillo O; Jiménez-Garrudo A
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3087071. PubMed ID: 34513989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fabrication of titanium removable dental prosthesis frameworks with a 2-step investment coating method.
Koike M; Hummel SK; Ball JD; Okabe T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 22633596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting bone remodeling around tissue- and bone-level dental implants used in reduced bone width.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Dard MM; Cehreli MC
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2250-7. PubMed ID: 23876712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig.
Gottlow J; Dard M; Kjellson F; Obrecht M; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants.
Akça K; Eser A; Çavuşoğlu Y; Sağırkaya E; Çehreli MC
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 May; 53(5):453-62. PubMed ID: 25725630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Abutment-to-fixture load transfer and peri-implant bone stress.
Van Oers RF; Feilzer AJ
Am J Dent; 2015 Oct; 28(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 26714340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bone response from a dynamic stimulus on a one-piece and multi-piece implant abutment and crown by finite element analysis.
Hajimiragha H; Abolbashari M; Nokar S; Abolbashari A; Abolbashari M
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Oct; 40(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 23317175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Materials characteristics of uncoated/ceramic-coated implant materials.
Lacefield WR
Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():21-6. PubMed ID: 11276742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stress dissipation in the bone through various crown materials of dental implant restoration: a 2-D finite element analysis.
Bijjargi S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 23172842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
