171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995142)
21. International differences in the use of obstetric interventions.
Notzon FC
JAMA; 1990 Jun; 263(24):3286-91. PubMed ID: 2348539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An investigation of Caesarean sections in three Greek hospitals: the impact of financial incentives and convenience.
Mossialos E; Allin S; Karras K; Davaki K
Eur J Public Health; 2005 Jun; 15(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 15923214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Trends in access to health services and financial protection in China between 2003 and 2011: a cross-sectional study.
Meng Q; Xu L; Zhang Y; Qian J; Cai M; Xin Y; Gao J; Xu K; Boerma JT; Barber SL
Lancet; 2012 Mar; 379(9818):805-14. PubMed ID: 22386034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study.
Hsia RY; Akosa Antwi Y; Weber E
BMJ Open; 2014 Jan; 4(1):e004017. PubMed ID: 24435892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.
Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingan D; Tan LK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Apr; 41(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 25371294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. One health maintenance organization's experience: obstetric costs depend more on staffing patterns than on mode of delivery.
Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD
J Perinatol; 1997; 17(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 9134516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost of vaginal delivery vs. repeated cesarean section.
Gillette RD
Am Fam Physician; 1996 May; 53(7):2284, 2287. PubMed ID: 8638505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan.
Xirasagar S; Lin HC; Liu TC
Health Policy Plan; 2006 Jul; 21(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 16790455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimating cost of hospitalization for childbirth at a tertiary hospital in Mongolia.
Taazan B; Yamamoto E; Baatar B; Amgalanbaatar A; Kariya T; Saw YM; Hamajima N
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 82(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 32273632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births.
Declercq E; Barger M; Cabral HJ; Evans SR; Kotelchuck M; Simon C; Weiss J; Heffner LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):669-77. PubMed ID: 17329519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery.
Ashwal E; Wertheimer A; Aviram A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(16):2665-70. PubMed ID: 26399162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative analysis of neonatal morbidity for vaginal and caesarean section deliveries using hospital charge.
Chang JH; Hsu CY; Lo JC; Chen CP; Huang FY; Yu S
Acta Paediatr; 2006 Dec; 95(12):1561-6. PubMed ID: 17129962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors related to the high cesarean section rate and their effects on the "price transparency policy" in Beijing, China.
Hong X
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2007 Jul; 212(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 17592216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.
Triunfo S; Ferrazzani S; Lanzone A; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():91-5. PubMed ID: 25898370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of a patient's social status on the cost of vaginal deliveries: an observational study in a French university hospital.
Vermeulin T; Lucas M; Froment L; Josset V; Czernichow P; Verspyck E; Merle V
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 48(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 30412788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery.
Henderson J; McCandlish R; Kumiega L; Petrou S
BJOG; 2001 Feb; 108(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 11236114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Not as much as you think: toward a truer estimate of the difference in direct medical costs between vaginal and cesarean deliveries.
Malkin JD
Birth; 2001 Sep; 28(3):208-9. PubMed ID: 11552970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.
Keeler EB; Brodie M
Milbank Q; 1993; 71(3):365-404. PubMed ID: 8413067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications.
Lin HC; Xirasagar S
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 14704256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
