These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995142)

  • 61. An economic analysis of trial of labor after cesarean delivery.
    Friedman AM; Ananth CV; Chen L; D'Alton ME; Wright JD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(7):1030-5. PubMed ID: 25865742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Economic implications of method of delivery.
    Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Farrell SA; Baskett TF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 193(1):192-7. PubMed ID: 16021078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [High-risk pregnancy, costs and DRG reimbursement].
    Mathisen AB; Vaaler S; Dramstad E; Abyholm T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Feb; 122(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 11961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Incremental charges, costs, and length of stay associated with obesity as a secondary diagnosis among pregnant women.
    Trasande L; Lee M; Liu Y; Weitzman M; Savitz D
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1046-52. PubMed ID: 19820612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Previous cesarean section. A contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy?
    Poindexter YM; Sangi-Haghpeykar H; Poindexter AN; Thomakos N; Young RL; Fine PM; Miller HJ
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):840-4. PubMed ID: 11584488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery.
    Melamed N; Segev M; Hadar E; Peled Y; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 209(1):49.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23507547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Effect of patient risk on the volume-outcome relationship in obstetric delivery services.
    Lee KS; Kwak JM
    Health Policy; 2014 Dec; 118(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 24957418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Twin vaginal birth after cesarean.
    Wax JR; Philput C; Mather J; Steinfeld JD; Ingardia CJ
    Conn Med; 2000 Apr; 64(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 10812766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
    Rouse DJ; Owen J; Goldenberg RL; Cliver SP
    JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(18):1480-6. PubMed ID: 8903259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [Time trend of the rates of cesarean and vaginal delivery according to the source of financing].
    Paris GF; Monteschio LV; de Oliveira RR; Latorre Mdo R; Pelloso SM; Mathias TA
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 36(12):548-54. PubMed ID: 25466813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China.
    Cai WW; Marks JS; Chen CH; Zhuang YX; Morris L; Harris JR
    Am J Public Health; 1998 May; 88(5):777-80. PubMed ID: 9585744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Cesarean rate in selected hospital network of private sector: A retrospective study.
    Farrés A; Albarracín A; Serra B; Prats P
    J Healthc Qual Res; 2021; 36(6):317-323. PubMed ID: 34353772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Cost analysis for deliveries according to maternal age classes for moving to a personalized approach in the health care.
    Triunfo S; Petrillo F; Lofoco F; Volpe M; Lanzone A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jan; 34(2):223-230. PubMed ID: 30957596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Costs of publicly provided maternity services in Rosario, Argentina.
    Borghi J; Bastus S; Belizan M; Carroli G; Hutton G; Fox-Rushby J
    Salud Publica Mex; 2003; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 12649959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Preeclampsia in Switzerland: a cost analysis in two hospitals.
    Hodel M; Blank PR; Marty P; Lapaire O
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):926-931. PubMed ID: 32462948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Factors influencing length of stay and costs in inpatient cases of human brucellosis as the primary diagnosis over a decade in Beijing, China.
    Ma X; Wang W; Wu Q; Zheng C; Liu J; Bai H; Zhang T; Li L; Liu L
    Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1347693. PubMed ID: 38813407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Medicaid coverage and medical interventions during pregnancy.
    Turcotte L; Robst J; Polachek S
    Int J Health Care Finance Econ; 2005 Sep; 5(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 16082518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Comparison of hospital delivery costs between cesarean section and natural delivery and analysis of influencing factors.
    Ouyang S; Yao Z; Dai W; Liu Y; Liu P; Luo J
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 May; 48(5):733-742. PubMed ID: 37539576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The impact of Health Transformation Plan on natural vaginal delivery and cesarean section frequency in Iran: an interrupted time series analysis.
    Lotfi F; Lohivash S; Kavosi Z; Owjimehr S; Bayati M
    BMC Res Notes; 2021 Jul; 14(1):257. PubMed ID: 34217368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.