These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

665 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995370)

  • 1. The impact of ultra-radical surgery in the management of patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.
    Turnbull HL; Akrivos N; Wemyss-Holden S; Maiya B; Duncan TJ; Nieto JJ; Burbos N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 295(3):681-687. PubMed ID: 27995370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of bulky upper abdominal disease cephalad to the greater omentum on surgical outcome for stage IIIC epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
    Zivanovic O; Eisenhauer EL; Zhou Q; Iasonos A; Sabbatini P; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Chi DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17996927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Celiac lymph node resection and porta hepatis disease resection in advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
    Martinez A; Pomel C; Mery E; Querleu D; Gladieff L; Ferron G
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 May; 121(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 21295334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximal cytoreduction in patients with FIGO stage IIIC to stage IV ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal cancer in day-to-day practice: a Retrospective French Multicentric Study.
    Luyckx M; Leblanc E; Filleron T; Morice P; Darai E; Classe JM; Ferron G; Stoeckle E; Pomel C; Vinet B; Chereau E; Bergzoll C; Querleu D
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1337-43. PubMed ID: 22964527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach.
    Chi DS; Franklin CC; Levine DA; Akselrod F; Sabbatini P; Jarnagin WR; DeMatteo R; Poynor EA; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Sep; 94(3):650-4. PubMed ID: 15350354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of ablation and ultrasonic aspiration at primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.
    Li S; Manning-Geist B; Gockley A; Ramos A; Sisodia RC; Del Carmen M; Growdon WB; Horowitz N; Berkowitz R; Worley M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):1052-1057. PubMed ID: 32487686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moving beyond "complete surgical resection" and "optimal": Is low-volume residual disease another option for primary debulking surgery?
    Manning-Geist BL; Hicks-Courant K; Gockley AA; Clark RM; Del Carmen MG; Growdon WB; Horowitz NS; Berkowitz RS; Muto MG; Worley MJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 150(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 29933927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel classification of residual disease after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer to better distinguish oncologic outcome.
    Manning-Geist BL; Hicks-Courant K; Gockley AA; Clark RM; Del Carmen MG; Growdon WB; Horowitz NS; Berkowitz RS; Muto MG; Worley MJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):326.e1-326.e7. PubMed ID: 31082382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perioperative epidural use and survival outcomes in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.
    Tseng JH; Cowan RA; Afonso AM; Zhou Q; Iasonos A; Ali N; Thompson E; Sonoda Y; O'Cearbhaill RE; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Long Roche K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 151(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 30185381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of video laparoscopic surgical debulking of recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers.
    Nezhat FR; Denoble SM; Cho JE; Brown DN; Soto E; Chuang L; Gretz H; Saharia P
    JSLS; 2012; 16(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 23484556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A preoperative low cancer antigen 125 level (≤25.8 mg/dl) is a useful criterion to determine the optimal timing of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Morimoto A; Nagao S; Kogiku A; Yamamoto K; Miwa M; Wakahashi S; Ichida K; Sudo T; Yamaguchi S; Fujiwara K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 46(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 26977055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposal for selection criteria of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers.
    Minaguchi T; Satoh T; Matsumoto K; Sakurai M; Ochi H; Onuki M; Oki A; Yoshikawa H
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 21(3):573-9. PubMed ID: 26475355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond tertiary cytoreduction in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.
    Shih KK; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 19897231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrence patterns of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers after complete cytoreduction during interval debulking surgery.
    Usami T; Kato K; Taniguchi T; Abe A; Nomura H; Yamamoto A; Matoda M; Okamoto S; Kondo E; Omatsu K; Kawamata Y; Takeshima N
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):991-6. PubMed ID: 24905612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
    Chi DS; Musa F; Dao F; Zivanovic O; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Levine DA; Gardner GJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 21917306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal primary management of bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma: Are the only options complete gross resection at primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
    Sioulas VD; Schiavone MB; Kadouri D; Zivanovic O; Roche KL; O'Cearbhaill R; Abu-Rustum NR; Levine DA; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Leitao MM; Chi DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28238354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Laparoscopy to Assess Resectability in Stage IIIC Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal and Peritoneal Cancer Patients.
    Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Perez-Benavente A; Correa-Paris A; De la Torre Fernandez de Vega J; Carbonell Socias M; Gil-Moreno A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 30428466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of residual disease on overall survival in women with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB-IIIC vs stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.
    Sørensen SM; Schnack TH; Høgdall C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jan; 98(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 30168853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The incidence of major complications after the performance of extensive upper abdominal surgical procedures during primary cytoreduction of advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinomas.
    Chi DS; Zivanovic O; Levinson KL; Kolev V; Huh J; Dottino J; Gardner GJ; Leitao MM; Levine DA; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Brown CL; Barakat RR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Oct; 119(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20609464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Porta hepatis peritonectomy and hepato-celiac lymphadenectomy in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: Diagnostic pathway, surgical technique and outcomes.
    Tozzi R; Traill Z; Garruto Campanile R; Ferrari F; Soleymani Majd H; Nieuwstad J; Hardern K; Gubbala K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 143(1):35-39. PubMed ID: 27519966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.