These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995445)

  • 1. Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.
    Horbach SPJM; Halffman W
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1461-1485. PubMed ID: 27995445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997-2016).
    Lei L; Zhang Y
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1409-1420. PubMed ID: 28889329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema.
    Shaw D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1085-1093. PubMed ID: 29594670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data falsification and question on academic integrity.
    Nurunnabi M; Hossain MA
    Account Res; 2019 Feb; 26(2):108-122. PubMed ID: 30595069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific fraud: social deviance or the failure of virtue?
    List CJ
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1985; 10(4):27-36. PubMed ID: 11649815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific fraud: definitions, policies, and implications for nursing research.
    Chop RM; Silva MC
    J Prof Nurs; 1991; 7(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 2061524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.
    Ayodele FO; Yao L; Haron H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):357-382. PubMed ID: 29441445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.
    Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S
    J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific integrity and fraud in radiology research.
    Kwee RM; Almaghrabi MT; Kwee TC
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110553. PubMed ID: 36228454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Role of research institutions in management of scientific fraud: The example of Inserm Scientific Integrity delegation].
    Bungener M; Hadchouel M
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):841-6. PubMed ID: 22727982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Integrity in science: a constant concern].
    Drenth PJ
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):321-33. PubMed ID: 15641563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific Misconduct (Fraud) in Medical Writing.
    Mavrogenis AF; Panagopoulos GN; Megaloikonomos PD; Panagopoulos VN; Mauffrey C; Quaile A; Scarlat MM
    Orthopedics; 2018 Mar; 41(2):e176-e183. PubMed ID: 29377051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Scientific misconduct: A major threat for medical research].
    Barde F; Peiffer-Smadja N; de La Blanchardière A
    Rev Med Interne; 2020 May; 41(5):330-334. PubMed ID: 32107052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linguistic traces of a scientific fraud: the case of Diederik Stapel.
    Markowitz DM; Hancock JT
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105937. PubMed ID: 25153333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity.
    Davies SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1235-1253. PubMed ID: 30251235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The challenges for scientists in avoiding plagiarism.
    Fisher ER; Partin KM
    Account Res; 2014; 21(6):353-65. PubMed ID: 24785995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addressing research integrity challenges: from penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care.
    Zwart H; Ter Meulen R
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2019 Jun; 15(1):5. PubMed ID: 31179512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.