BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995896)

  • 1. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
    Nissen SB; Magidson T; Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    Elife; 2016 Dec; 5():. PubMed ID: 27995896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Problem of False Discovery: Many Scientific Results Can't Be Replicated, Leading to Serious Questions about What's True and False in the World of Research.
    Foster KR; Skufca J
    IEEE Pulse; 2016; 7(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 26978851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
    Schneck A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.
    Guan M; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery.
    McElreath R; Smaldino PE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136088. PubMed ID: 26308448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding belief using citation networks.
    Greenberg SA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Apr; 17(2):389-93. PubMed ID: 21392183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
    Friese M; Frankenbach J
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.
    Forstmeier W; Wagenmakers EJ; Parker TH
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Nov; 92(4):1941-1968. PubMed ID: 27879038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication bias in epidemiological studies.
    Siddiqi N
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2011 Jun; 19(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 21739906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate.
    Bryan CJ; Yeager DS; O'Brien JM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(51):25535-25545. PubMed ID: 31767750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the false discovery risk of (randomized) clinical trials in medical journals based on published p-values.
    Schimmack U; Bartoš F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290084. PubMed ID: 37647247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publish without bias or perish without replications.
    Ventura R
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Dec; 96():10-17. PubMed ID: 36137303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):975-91. PubMed ID: 23055145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low replicability can support robust and efficient science.
    Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jan; 11(1):358. PubMed ID: 31953411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling publication bias and p-hacking.
    Moss J; De Bin R
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 34510407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are most published research findings false in a continuous universe?
    Neves K; Tan PB; Amaral OB
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277935. PubMed ID: 36538521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Tutorial on Hunting Statistical Significance by Chasing
    Szucs D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1444. PubMed ID: 27713723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
    Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Too good to be true: publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22351589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.