These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27995896)

  • 41. Do financial factors such as author page charges and industry funding impact on the nature of published research in infectious diseases?
    Liyanage SS; Raina Macintyre C
    Health Info Libr J; 2006 Sep; 23(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 16911128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Decision-making in research tasks with sequential testing.
    Pfeiffer T; Rand DG; Dreber A
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(2):e4607. PubMed ID: 19240797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study.
    Decullier E; Lhéritier V; Chapuis F
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7507):19. PubMed ID: 15967761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might.
    de Jonge P; Conradi HJ; Thombs BD; Rosmalen JG; Burger H; Ormel J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Feb; 65(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 21113013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease.
    Lohmueller KE; Pearce CL; Pike M; Lander ES; Hirschhorn JN
    Nat Genet; 2003 Feb; 33(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 12524541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Replication Research, Publication Bias, and Applied Behavior Analysis.
    Tincani M; Travers J
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2019 Mar; 42(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 31976421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure.
    Grimes DR; Bauch CT; Ioannidis JPA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Jan; 5(1):171511. PubMed ID: 29410855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. How reliable are scientific studies?
    Munafò MR; Flint J
    Br J Psychiatry; 2010 Oct; 197(4):257-8. PubMed ID: 20884944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Publication bias as a function of study characteristics.
    Coburn KM; Vevea JL
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):310-30. PubMed ID: 26348731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. It has not been proven why or that most research findings are false.
    Ashton JC
    Med Hypotheses; 2018 Apr; 113():27-29. PubMed ID: 29523288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.
    Murayama K; Pekrun R; Fiedler K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 23965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Publication bias--the Achilles' heel of medical research].
    Luoto R
    Duodecim; 2012; 128(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 22486064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: an example of publication bias?
    de Bruin A; Treccani B; Della Sala S
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 25475825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
    Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
    BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research.
    Dirnagl U
    Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2020; 257():71-79. PubMed ID: 31696348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Implications of "Too Good to Be True" for Replication, Theoretical Claims, and Experimental Design: An Example Using Prominent Studies of Racial Bias.
    Francis G
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1382. PubMed ID: 27713708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Intentional and Non-Intentional Distortion of Research Findings].
    Kamińska D; Kusztal M
    Polim Med; 2015; 45(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 26630723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. What is wrong with the medical literature?
    Bell RJ
    Climacteric; 2017 Feb; 20(1):22-24. PubMed ID: 27813657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. What you see depends on where you're looking and how you look at it: publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
    Howland RH
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2011 Aug; 49(8):13-5. PubMed ID: 21766733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.