500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27996253)
1. Efficient Approximation of Ligand Rotational and Translational Entropy Changes upon Binding for Use in MM-PBSA Calculations.
Ben-Shalom IY; Pfeiffer-Marek S; Baringhaus KH; Gohlke H
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):170-189. PubMed ID: 27996253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.
Wang J; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the solvent representation on vibrational entropy calculations: generalized born versus distance-dependent dielectric model.
Kopitz H; Cashman DA; Pfeiffer-Marek S; Gohlke H
J Comput Chem; 2012 Apr; 33(9):1004-13. PubMed ID: 22298332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
Genheden S; Ryde U
Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing end-point methods for absolute binding free energy calculation using the Boltzmann-quasiharmonic model.
Wickstrom L; Gallicchio E; Chen L; Kurtzman T; Deng N
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Mar; 24(10):6037-6052. PubMed ID: 35212338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Converging free energy estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA studies on the protein-protein complex Ras-Raf.
Gohlke H; Case DA
J Comput Chem; 2004 Jan; 25(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 14648622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Entropic cost of protein-ligand binding and its dependence on the entropy in solution.
Irudayam SJ; Henchman RH
J Phys Chem B; 2009 Apr; 113(17):5871-84. PubMed ID: 19351118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Affinity Calculations of Cyclodextrin Host-Guest Complexes: Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses of End-Point Free Energy Methods.
Suárez D; Díaz N
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):421-440. PubMed ID: 30566348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining methods for calculations of binding free energies: LRA, LIE, PDLD-LRA, and PDLD/S-LRA calculations of ligands binding to an HIV protease.
Sham YY; Chu ZT; Tao H; Warshel A
Proteins; 2000 Jun; 39(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10813821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 7. Entropy effects on the performance of end-point binding free energy calculation approaches.
Sun H; Duan L; Chen F; Liu H; Wang Z; Pan P; Zhu F; Zhang JZH; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 May; 20(21):14450-14460. PubMed ID: 29785435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An accurate free energy estimator: based on MM/PBSA combined with interaction entropy for protein-ligand binding affinity.
Huang K; Luo S; Cong Y; Zhong S; Zhang JZH; Duan L
Nanoscale; 2020 May; 12(19):10737-10750. PubMed ID: 32388542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postprocessing of docked protein-ligand complexes using implicit solvation models.
Lindström A; Edvinsson L; Johansson A; Andersson CD; Andersson IE; Raubacher F; Linusson A
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 21309544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the LIE Method for Binding Free Energy Calculations of Protein-Ligand Complexes.
Miranda WE; Noskov SY; Valiente PA
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):1867-77. PubMed ID: 26180998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of atomic charge, solvation, entropy, and ligand protonation state on MM-PB(GB)SA binding energies of HIV protease.
Oehme DP; Brownlee RT; Wilson DJ
J Comput Chem; 2012 Dec; 33(32):2566-80. PubMed ID: 22915442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.
Genheden S; Ryde U
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 May; 10(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 25835573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 scoring exercise.
Sulea T; Cui Q; Purisima EO
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2066-81. PubMed ID: 21714553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Addressing limitations with the MM-GB/SA scoring procedure using the WaterMap method and free energy perturbation calculations.
Guimarães CR; Mathiowetz AM
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 20235592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance of polar solvation and configurational entropy for design of antiretroviral drugs targeting HIV-1 protease.
Kar P; Lipowsky R; Knecht V
J Phys Chem B; 2013 May; 117(19):5793-805. PubMed ID: 23614718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
