These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27996297)

  • 21. A novel computer system for the evaluation of nasolabial morphology, symmetry and aesthetics after cleft lip and palate treatment. Part 2: Comparative anthropometric analysis of patients with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and healthy individuals.
    Pietruski P; Majak M; Pawlowska E; Skiba A; Antoszewski B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):505-514. PubMed ID: 28258919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: a comparison with Eurocleft.
    Nollet PJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Chatzigianni A; Semb G; Shaw WC; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(6-7):278-86. PubMed ID: 17904376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Americleft Project: Comparison of Ratings Using Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Images for Evaluation of Nasolabial Appearance in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Jones CM; Roth B; Mercado AM; Russell KA; Daskalogiannakis J; Samson TD; Hathaway RR; Smith A; Mackay DR; Long RE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):105-108. PubMed ID: 29286995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of the Submental Nasal Appearance Scale for the Assessment of Repaired Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip: A Pilot Study.
    Tan RA; Isaac KV; Ganske IM; Mosmuller DGM; de Vet HCW; Griot JPWD; Mulliken JB
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Jul; 56(6):791-798. PubMed ID: 30463427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
    Kocher K; Kowalski P; Kolokitha OE; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e45-52. PubMed ID: 25932752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nasolabial aesthetics correlates poorly with skeletal symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Urbanova W; Brudnicki A; Strydom H; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jan; 66(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 22985870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel computer system for the evaluation of nasolabial morphology, symmetry and aesthetics after cleft lip and palate treatment. Part 1: General concept and validation.
    Pietruski P; Majak M; Debski T; Antoszewski B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 28238558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate.
    Asher-McDade C; Roberts C; Shaw WC; Gallager C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Oct; 28(4):385-90; discussion 390-1. PubMed ID: 1742308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of lip revision surgery on nasolabial esthetics in patients with cleft lip.
    Mercado AM; Phillips C; Vig KW; Trotman CA
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 24846148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Basal View Reference Photographs for Nasolabial Appearance Rating in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Rubin MS; Lowe KM; Clouston S; Shetye PR; Warren SM; Grayson BH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1548-50. PubMed ID: 26163840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facial Aesthetic Outcomes of Cleft Surgery: Assessment of Discrete Lip and Nose Images Compared with Digital Symmetry Analysis.
    Deall CE; Kornmann NSS; Bella H; Wallis KL; Hardwicke JT; Su TL; Richard BM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):855-862. PubMed ID: 27307335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Secondary cleft nose rhinoplasty: Subjective and objective outcome evaluation.
    Gassling V; Koos B; Birkenfeld F; Wiltfang J; Zimmermann CE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1855-62. PubMed ID: 26412642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of nasolabial aesthetics by different groups in operated unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Dogan E; Tiftikcioglu Y; Dogan S
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 121(6):672-679. PubMed ID: 32007634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 3D Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Bagante I; Zepa I; Akota I
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Feb; 55(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29351025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Americleft Project: A Modification of Asher-McDade Method for Rating Nasolabial Esthetics in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Q-sort.
    Stoutland A; Long RE; Mercado A; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway RR; Russell KA; Singer E; Semb G; Shaw WC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 28906328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of nasoalveolar molding on nasolabial aesthetics in patients with cleft lip and palate during pre-adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
    Likitkulthanaporn A; Boonpratham S; Honglertnapakul Y; Saengfai NN; Chaweewannakorn C; Jongkhum N; Peanchitlertkajorn S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Jun; 27(3):350-363. PubMed ID: 38288677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 8. Assessing naso-labial appearance in 5-year-olds - a preliminary study.
    Mølsted K; Humerinta K; Küseler A; Skaare P; Bellardie H; Shaw W; Karsten A; Kåre Sæle P; Rizell S; Marcusson A; Eyres P; Semb G
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2017 Feb; 51(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 28218555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Aesthetic evaluation of the nasolabial region in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate comparing expert versus nonexperience health professionals.
    Paiva TS; Andre M; Paiva WS; Mattos BS
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():460106. PubMed ID: 25126560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople.
    Papamanou DA; Gkantidis N; Topouzelis N; Christou P
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 34(5):553-60. PubMed ID: 21771802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative Assessment of the Cleft Profile by Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate, Cleft Surgeons, and Lay People.
    Meng T; Ma L; Wang Z
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Oct; 39(5):757-63. PubMed ID: 26304598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.