110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27996299)
1. DNA recovery from microhymenoptera using six non-destructive methodologies with considerations for subsequent preparation of museum slides.
Guzmán-Larralde AJ; Suaste-Dzul AP; Gallou A; Peña-Carrillo KI
Genome; 2017 Jan; 60(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 27996299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-destructive DNA extraction methods for entomophagous insects with emphasis on biological control.
Suaste-Dzul AP; Rodríguez-Vélez JM; Rodríguez-Vélez B; Arredondo-Bernal HC; Gallou A
Genome; 2019 Apr; 62(4):287-293. PubMed ID: 30817213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA analysis of molluscs from a museum wet collection: a comparison of different extraction methods.
Jaksch K; Eschner A; Rintelen TV; Haring E
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jul; 9():348. PubMed ID: 27430899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collecting in collections: a PCR strategy and primer set for DNA barcoding of decades-old dried museum specimens.
Mitchell A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Sep; 15(5):1102-11. PubMed ID: 25644663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA extraction from dry museum beetles without conferring external morphological damage.
Gilbert MT; Moore W; Melchior L; Worobey M
PLoS One; 2007 Mar; 2(3):e272. PubMed ID: 17342206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias.
Clarke LJ; Soubrier J; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Nov; 14(6):1160-70. PubMed ID: 24751203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Isolation of DNA from museum exhibits of butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) and PCR analysis with random and universal genes-specific primers].
Zakharov EV; Chelomina GN; Zhuravlev IuN
Genetika; 2000 Sep; 36(9):1221-9. PubMed ID: 11042808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of manual and semi-automatic DNA extraction protocols for the barcoding characterization of hematophagous louse flies (Diptera: Hippoboscidae).
Gutiérrez-López R; Martínez-de la Puente J; Gangoso L; Soriguer RC; Figuerola J
J Vector Ecol; 2015 Jun; 40(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 26047179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endemism and diversification in freshwater insects of Madagascar revealed by coalescent and phylogenetic analysis of museum and field collections.
Vuataz L; Sartori M; Gattolliat JL; Monaghan MT
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):979-91. PubMed ID: 23261711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recovery of DNA barcodes from blackfly museum specimens (Diptera: Simuliidae) using primer sets that target a variety of sequence lengths.
Hernández-Triana LM; Prosser SW; Rodríguez-Perez MA; Chaverri LG; Hebert PD; Gregory TR
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 May; 14(3):508-18. PubMed ID: 24299419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simplified and optimized protocol for total DNA extraction from insect species: applicable for studying genetic diversity and PCR-based specimen identification via partial amplification of cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene.
Paydar S; Ucar E; Yari P; Safavi SM; Kahrizi D; Nateqi M; Mirmoayedi A; Yari K
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2018 Sep; 64(12):22-25. PubMed ID: 30301497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new cost-effective and fast direct PCR protocol for insects based on PBS buffer.
Thongjued K; Chotigeat W; Bumrungsri S; Thanakiatkrai P; Kitpipit T
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 May; 19(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 30758899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. More than skin and bones: Comparing extraction methods and alternative sources of DNA from avian museum specimens.
Tsai WLE; Schedl ME; Maley JM; McCormack JE
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 31478338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advantages of an easy-to-use DNA extraction method for minimal-destructive analysis of collection specimens.
Patzold F; Zilli A; Hundsdoerfer AK
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235222. PubMed ID: 32639972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequencing historical specimens: successful preparation of small specimens with low amounts of degraded DNA.
Sproul JS; Maddison DR
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1183-1201. PubMed ID: 28199781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nondestructive DNA extraction from museum specimens.
Hofreiter M
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 840():93-100. PubMed ID: 22237527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-destructive DNA extraction from herbarium specimens: a method particularly suitable for plants with small and fragile leaves.
Sugita N; Ebihara A; Hosoya T; Jinbo U; Kaneko S; Kurosawa T; Nakae M; Yukawa T
J Plant Res; 2020 Jan; 133(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 31760570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calibrating the taxonomy of a megadiverse insect family: 3000 DNA barcodes from geometrid type specimens (Lepidoptera, Geometridae).
Hausmann A; Miller SE; Holloway JD; deWaard JR; Pollock D; Prosser SW; Hebert PD
Genome; 2016 Sep; 59(9):671-84. PubMed ID: 27549513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytochrome c oxidase I primers for corbiculate bees: DNA barcode and mini-barcode.
Françoso E; Arias MC
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Sep; 13(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 23848578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA extraction from museum specimens of parasitic Hymenoptera.
Andersen JC; Mills NJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e45549. PubMed ID: 23077493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
