These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization. Carter JA; Bidelman GM Brain Res; 2021 May; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laminar cortical dynamics of conscious speech perception: neural model of phonemic restoration using subsequent context in noise. Grossberg S; Kazerounian S J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):440-60. PubMed ID: 21786911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust cortical encoding of slow temporal modulations of speech. Ding N; Simon JZ Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():373-81. PubMed ID: 23716243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of masking on the activation of auditory-associated cortex during speech listening in white noise. Hwang JH; Wu CW; Chen JH; Liu TC Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):916-20. PubMed ID: 16864487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study. Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers. Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing. Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise differentially impacts phoneme representations in the auditory and speech motor systems. Du Y; Buchsbaum BR; Grady CL; Alain C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 May; 111(19):7126-31. PubMed ID: 24778251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic phoneme category selectivity in the dorsal auditory stream. Chevillet MA; Jiang X; Rauschecker JP; Riesenhuber M J Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 33(12):5208-15. PubMed ID: 23516286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech. Freyman RL; Morse-Fortier C; Griffin AM J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1418-27. PubMed ID: 26428780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The neural processing of masked speech. Scott SK; McGettigan C Hear Res; 2013 Sep; 303():58-66. PubMed ID: 23685149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]