These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27997566)

  • 1. Autonomous Vehicles: Disengagements, Accidents and Reaction Times.
    Dixit VV; Chand S; Nair DJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168054. PubMed ID: 27997566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring causes and effects of automated vehicle disengagement using statistical modeling and classification tree based on field test data.
    Wang S; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():44-54. PubMed ID: 31103878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the who, what, when, where, and why of automated vehicle disengagements.
    Boggs AM; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105406. PubMed ID: 31887460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autonomous vehicles' disengagements: Trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations.
    Favarò F; Eurich S; Nader N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():136-148. PubMed ID: 29136558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.
    Teoh ER; Kidd DG
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():57-60. PubMed ID: 29203024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
    Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 17178651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind.
    Merat N; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 23156614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated Driving System Collisions: Early Lessons.
    Biever W; Angell L; Seaman S
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):249-259. PubMed ID: 31502899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106593. PubMed ID: 35180465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tools for Transport: Driven to Learn With Connected Vehicles.
    Morris N; Craig C; Mirman JH
    Top Cogn Sci; 2021 Oct; 13(4):708-727. PubMed ID: 34245660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
    Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.
    McDonald AD; Alambeigi H; Engström J; Markkula G; Vogelpohl T; Dunne J; Yuma N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):642-688. PubMed ID: 30830804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility study of highway alignment design controls for autonomous vehicles.
    Ye X; Wang X; Liu S; Tarko AP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106252. PubMed ID: 34171633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. sCARy! Risk Perceptions in Autonomous Driving: The Influence of Experience on Perceived Benefits and Barriers.
    Brell T; Philipsen R; Ziefle M
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):342-357. PubMed ID: 30239015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.