These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27997984)

  • 1. The relationship between lip-closing force and dental arch morphology in patient with Angle Class I malocclusion.
    Takehana Y; Masuda Y; Kageyama T; Okazaki R; Murakami M; Yamada K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 44(3):205-212. PubMed ID: 27997984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between frontal craniofacial morphology and horizontal balance of lip-closing forces during lip pursing.
    Mizuno R; Yamada K; Murakami M; Kaede K; Masuda Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 41(9):659-66. PubMed ID: 24889375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of upper lip closing force on craniofacial structures.
    Jung MH; Yang WS; Nahm DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 12532064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender differences in maximum voluntary lip-closing force during lip pursing in healthy young adults.
    Murakami M; Adachi T; Nakatsuka K; Kato T; Oishi M; Masuda Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 39(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 22115393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum closing force of mentolabial muscles and type of malocclusion.
    Jung MH; Yang WS; Nahm DS
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 19852643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multidirectional lip-closing force in adults with mandibular deviation.
    Kawabata A; Kobayashi T; Takagi A; Kuroyanagi F; Washino K; Sabashi K; Kitai N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Sep; 40(9):664-9. PubMed ID: 23855528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group.
    Wahaj A; Ahmed I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):811-4. PubMed ID: 26577967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related differences in maximum voluntary lip-closing force and ability to control lip-closing force.
    Hijiya K; Masuda Y; Miyamoto T; Shimono R; Kato T; Kageyama T; Yamada K
    J Oral Biosci; 2021 Jun; 63(2):210-216. PubMed ID: 33652121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ability to control directional lip-closing force during voluntary lip pursing in healthy young adults.
    Miyamoto T; Yamada K; Hijiya K; Kageyama T; Kato T; Sugo H; Shimono R; Masuda Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 46(6):526-532. PubMed ID: 30761567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lower lip sucking habit treated with a lip bumper appliance.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1071-6. PubMed ID: 16448257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between vertical facial morphology and dental arch measurements in class II malocclusion: a retrospective study.
    Ocak I; Karsli N; Altug AT; Aksu M
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16031. PubMed ID: 37692120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Lux CJ; Conradt C; Burden D; Komposch G
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):674-85. PubMed ID: 14719732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion.
    Shu R; Han X; Wang Y; Xu H; Ai D; Wang L; Wu Y; Bai D
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 23458279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Gupta D; Miner RM; Arai K; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.