These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Is your choice my choice? The owners' effect on pet dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task. Prato-Previde E; Marshall-Pescini S; Valsecchi P Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan; 11(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 17641921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. What counts for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a quantity discrimination task? Miletto Petrazzini ME; Wynne CD Behav Processes; 2016 Jan; 122():90-7. PubMed ID: 26601897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Delboeuf illusions: contour or size detector interactions? Jaeger T; Lorden R Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Apr; 50(2):376-8. PubMed ID: 7375287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Brightness illusion in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Agrillo C; Miletto Petrazzini ME; Bisazza A J Comp Psychol; 2016 Feb; 130(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 26881944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Foster RM; Franz VH Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous. Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Perception of the stereokinetic illusion by the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Clara E; Regolin L; Vallortigara G; Rogers L Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 16924457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The snow tire illusion: Different levels of perceptual assimilation across a single stimulus configuration. Gulan T; Valerjev P; Dujmović M Psych J; 2018 Jun; 7(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 29431259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A depth illusion supports the model of General Object Constancy: Size and depth constancies related by a same distance-scaling factor. Qian J; Petrov Y Vision Res; 2016 Dec; 129():77-86. PubMed ID: 27810350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Visual illusions and inattention: Their association with adiposity among adolescent girls. Bauer LO Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():310-6. PubMed ID: 26232136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The elusive illusion: Do children (Homo sapiens) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) see the Solitaire illusion? Parrish AE; Agrillo C; Perdue BM; Beran MJ J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Feb; 142():83-95. PubMed ID: 26513327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Retinal projection or size constancy as determinants of the horizontal-vertical illusion? von Collani G Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 4069920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]