These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28000115)

  • 1. Tied to expectations: Predicting features speeds processing even under adverse circumstances.
    Schwager S; Gaschler R; Rünger D; Frensch PA
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):611-624. PubMed ID: 28000115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor preparation and the effects of practice: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Hodges NJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):226-40. PubMed ID: 21280935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting faces and houses: category-specific visual action-effect prediction modulates late stages of sensory processing.
    Hughes G; Waszak F
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():11-8. PubMed ID: 24930591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The benefit of expecting no conflict--Stronger influence of self-generated than cue-induced conflict expectations on Stroop performance.
    Kemper M; Gaschler R; Schwager S; Schubert T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():135-41. PubMed ID: 26649453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus-driven attention modulates the release of anticipatory postural adjustments during step initiation.
    Tard C; Dujardin K; Bourriez JL; Derambure P; Defebvre L; Delval A
    Neuroscience; 2013 Sep; 247():25-34. PubMed ID: 23688436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.
    Wlotko EW; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():20-32. PubMed ID: 25987437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal expectation in focal hand dystonia.
    Avanzino L; Martino D; Martino I; Pelosin E; Vicario CM; Bove M; Defazio G; Abbruzzese G
    Brain; 2013 Feb; 136(Pt 2):444-54. PubMed ID: 23361064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor preparation of spatially and temporally defined movements: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Hodges NJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 106(2):885-94. PubMed ID: 21613586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. You can't always get what you want: the influence of unexpected task constraint on voluntary task switching.
    Weaver SM; Foxe JJ; Shpaner M; Wylie GR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2247-59. PubMed ID: 24916773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of target probability on pre-stimulus brain activity.
    Lucci G; Berchicci M; Perri RL; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():121-8. PubMed ID: 26912279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Timing in Predictive Coding: The Roles of Task Relevance and Global Probability.
    Sherwell C; Garrido MI; Cunnington R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 May; 29(5):780-792. PubMed ID: 27991186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coincidence Anticipation Timing Performance during an Acute Bout of Brisk Walking in Older Adults: Effect of Stimulus Speed.
    Duncan MJ; Stanley M; Smith M; Price MJ; Wright SL
    Neural Plast; 2015; 2015():210213. PubMed ID: 26417457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention modulation during motor preparation in Parkinsonian freezers: A time-frequency EEG study.
    Tard C; Dujardin K; Bourriez JL; Molaee-Ardekani B; Derambure P; Defebvre L; Delval A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Dec; 127(12):3506-3515. PubMed ID: 27815974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acting and anticipating: Impact of outcome-compatible distractor depends on response selection efficiency.
    Gozli DG; Huffman G; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1601-14. PubMed ID: 27280711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the limits of the Perruchet effect in choice response time tasks.
    Lee Cheong Lem VA; Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 26301613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down control of the phase of alpha-band oscillations as a mechanism for temporal prediction.
    Samaha J; Bauer P; Cimaroli S; Postle BR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jul; 112(27):8439-44. PubMed ID: 26100913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.