These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28000157)

  • 1. Out of sight, out of mind: Matching bias underlies confirmatory visual search.
    Rajsic J; Taylor JE; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 28000157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The price of information: Increased inspection costs reduce the confirmation bias in visual search.
    Rajsic J; Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):832-849. PubMed ID: 28056636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal organization of color and shape processing during visual search.
    Glavan JJ; Haggit JM; Houpt JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):426-456. PubMed ID: 32133598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The confirmation and prevalence biases in visual search reflect separate underlying processes.
    Walenchok SC; Goldinger SD; Hout MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):274-291. PubMed ID: 32077742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring the time course of selection during visual search.
    Palmer EM; Van Wert MJ; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 30242674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Altering attentional control settings causes persistent biases of visual attention.
    Knight HC; Smith DT; Knight DC; Ellison A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):129-49. PubMed ID: 25801329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False pop out.
    Orsten-Hooge KD; Portillo MC; Pomerantz JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1623-33. PubMed ID: 26214500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.
    Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.
    Chang S; Egeth HE
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 31693453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
    Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities.
    Zhao J; Al-Aidroos N; Turk-Browne NB
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 23558552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. More than a memory: Confirmatory visual search is not caused by remembering a visual feature.
    Rajsic J; Pratt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():169-174. PubMed ID: 28957733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple attentional sets while monitoring rapid serial visual presentations.
    Kawahara JI; Kumada T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Nov; 70(11):2271-2289. PubMed ID: 27603438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.
    Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4118-33. PubMed ID: 17005231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.