These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28000516)

  • 1. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants for continua varying in formant transition duration.
    Blankenship KG; Ohde RN; Won JH; Hedrick M
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Apr; 20(2):238-246. PubMed ID: 28000516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of speech perception in children with specific language impairment on a continuum of formant transition duration.
    Burlingame E; Sussman HM; Gillam RB; Hay JF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):805-16. PubMed ID: 16378475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.
    Moberly AC; Bhat J; Shahin AJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 26655914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants.
    Munson B; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2607-17. PubMed ID: 16266181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the structure of phoneme categories in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Lane H; Denny M; Guenther FH; Hanson HM; Marrone N; Matthies ML; Perkell JS; Stockmann E; Tiede M; Vick J; Zandipour M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 17344544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental role of static, dynamic, and contextual cues in speech perception.
    Bourland Hicks C; Ohde RN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):960-74. PubMed ID: 16378485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
    Hedrick M; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D; Younger MS
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.
    DiNino M; Arenberg JG; Duchen ALR; Winn MB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2425-2440. PubMed ID: 32552327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination and Identification of a Third Formant Frequency Cue to Place of Articulation by Young Children and Adults.
    Richardson K; Sussman JE
    Lang Speech; 2017 Mar; 60(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 28326988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual development of nasal consonants in children with normal hearing and in children who use cochlear implants.
    Guillot KM; Ohde RN; Hedrick M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1133-43. PubMed ID: 23785183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of formant transition cues to place of articulation in children with language impairments.
    Sussman JE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1286-99. PubMed ID: 8114495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
    Mahshie J; Core C; Larsen MD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of formant transition rate on the differentiation of synthesized child and adult (w) and (r) sounds.
    Ohde RN; Sharf DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Jun; 30(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 3599953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Jaekel BN; Newman RS; Goupell MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 May; 60(5):1398-1416. PubMed ID: 28395319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonological awareness in German-speaking preschool children with cochlear implants - 3 case examples.
    Wachtlin B; Turinsky Y; Herrmann F; Schaefer B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 100():198-203. PubMed ID: 28802372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.