These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28001245)

  • 1. The effect of standardised implantoplasty protocol on titanium surface roughness: an in-vitro study.
    Tawse-Smith A; Kota A; Jayaweera Y; Vuuren WJ; Ma S
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 Dec; 30(1):e137. PubMed ID: 28001245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation on titanium discs: a microscopy and trace elemental analysis in vitro study.
    Tawse-Smith A; Atieh MA; Tompkins G; Duncan WJ; Reid MR; Stirling CH
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 26094557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Titanium implant surface roughness after different implantoplasty protocols: A laboratory study.
    Yildiz H; Bertl K; Stavropoulos A
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Dec; 8(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 36069295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface roughness of dental implants and treatment time using six different implantoplasty procedures.
    Ramel CF; Lüssi A; Özcan M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jul; 27(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 26355907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of cell morphology and adhesion capacity of human gingival fibroblasts on titanium discs with different roughened surfaces: an in vitro scanning electron microscope analysis and cell culture study.
    Yildiz H; Sen E; Dalcik H; Meseli SE
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2023; 82(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 36000589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental implantoplasty outcomes correlate with fibroblast growth in vitro.
    Beheshti Maal M; Aanerød Ellingsen S; Reseland JE; Verket A
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):25. PubMed ID: 32000771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Titanium surface topography after brushing with fluoride and fluoride-free toothpaste simulating 10 years of use.
    Fais LM; Fernandes-Filho RB; Pereira-da-Silva MA; Vaz LG; Adabo GL
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 22265989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of different polishing protocols on the surface roughness of Y-TZP surfaces used for custom-made implant abutments: a controlled morphologic SEM and profilometric pilot study.
    Happe A; Röling N; Schäfer A; Rothamel D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 25749083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of implantoplasty on fracture resistance and surface roughness of standard diameter dental implants.
    Costa-Berenguer X; García-García M; Sánchez-Torres A; Sanz-Alonso M; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 28736922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of polishing instruments and polishing regimens on surface topography and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia: An evaluation with XPS and XRD analysis.
    Al-Haj Husain N; Camilleri J; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Dec; 64():104-12. PubMed ID: 27497266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Titanium Implant Characteristics After Implantoplasty: An In Vitro Study on Two Different Kinds of Instrumentation.
    Sahrmann P; Luso S; Mueller C; Ender A; Attin T; Stawarczyk B; Schmidlin PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 31711072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface roughness of a novel "ceramic restorative cement" after treatment with different polishing techniques in vitro.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW
    Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Mar; 7(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 12673434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of surface roughness parameters R
    Rosentritt M; Schneider-Feyrer S; Kurzendorfer L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106349. PubMed ID: 38169209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postadjustment polishing of CAD-CAM ceramic with luminescence diamond gel.
    Finger WJ; Noack MD
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction.
    Meredith L; Farella M; Lowrey S; Cannon RD; Mei L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):750-757. PubMed ID: 28364899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.