471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28001294)
1. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.
Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A
Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.
Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.
Ndze VN; Jaca A; Wiysonge CS
Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2836-2843. PubMed ID: 31166843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.
Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality.
Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading orthopedics journals: A systematic review.
Zhi X; Zhang Z; Cui J; Zhai X; Chen X; Su J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 28928047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
Page MJ; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From QUOROM to PRISMA: a survey of high-impact medical journals' instructions to authors and a review of systematic reviews in anesthesia literature.
Tao KM; Li XQ; Zhou QH; Moher D; Ling CQ; Yu WF
PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27611. PubMed ID: 22110690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses.
Panic N; Leoncini E; de Belvis G; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83138. PubMed ID: 24386151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement.
Nawijn F; Ham WHW; Houwert RM; Groenwold RHH; Hietbrink F; Smeeing DPJ
BMC Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 30744570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading gastroenterology and hepatology journals: A systematic review.
Liu P; Qiu Y; Qian Y; Chen X; Wang Y; Cui J; Zhai X
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27600190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
