These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28002069)

  • 1. Assessment of a smartphone app (Capstesia) for measuring pulse pressure variation: agreement between two methods: A Cross-sectional study.
    Barrachina B; Cobos R; Mardones N; Castañeda A; Vinuesa C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Feb; 34(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 28002069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ability of a New Smartphone Pulse Pressure Variation and Cardiac Output Application to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
    Joosten A; Boudart C; Vincent JL; Vanden Eynden F; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Rinehart J; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 31094781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Novel Mobile Phone Application for Pulse Pressure Variation Monitoring Based on Feature Extraction Technology: A Method Comparison Study in a Simulated Environment.
    Desebbe O; Joosten A; Suehiro K; Lahham S; Essiet M; Rinehart J; Cannesson M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Jul; 123(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 27144541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Concordance in the measurement of cardiac output. Vigileo vs. Capstesia].
    Santiago-López J; León-Ramírez V; Hernández-Ramírez S; Vásquez-Márquez PI; Castellanos-Olivares A
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2018; 56(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 29901910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of pulse pressure variation and cardiac output in patients having major abdominal surgery: a comparison between a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis and invasive pulse wave analysis.
    Hoppe P; Gleibs F; Briesenick L; Joosten A; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1203-1209. PubMed ID: 32749570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring of pulse pressure variation using a new smartphone application (Capstesia) versus stroke volume variation using an uncalibrated pulse wave analysis monitor: a clinical decision making study during major abdominal surgery.
    Joosten A; Jacobs A; Desebbe O; Vincent JL; Sarah S; Rinehart J; Van Obbergh L; Hapfelmeier A; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Oct; 33(5):787-793. PubMed ID: 30607806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Authentication of Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Pressure Waveform-Derived Cardiac Output With Transesophageal Echocardiography-Derived Cardiac Output Measurements in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery.
    Maddali MM; Waje ND; Sathiya PM
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 28465122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac output monitoring: A comparative prospective observational study of the conventional cardiac output monitor Vigileo™ and the new smartphone-based application Capstesia™.
    Shah SB; Bhargava AK; Hariharan U; Vishvakarma G; Jain CR; Kansal A
    Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Aug; 62(8):584-591. PubMed ID: 30166652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients.
    Hofer CK; Button D; Weibel L; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2010 Apr; 24(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 19700349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A minimally invasive monitoring system of cardiac output using aortic flow velocity and peripheral arterial pressure profile.
    Uemura K; Kawada T; Inagaki M; Sugimachi M
    Anesth Analg; 2013 May; 116(5):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 23492964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
    Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Fot EV; Zakharov VI; Izotova NN; Yudina AS; Dityateva ZA; Gromova YV; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, and plethysmographic variability index in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy].
    Liu YF; Song LL; Xing MW; Cai LX; Wang DX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):946-951. PubMed ID: 34650300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of an arterial pressure waveform analysis device: does the puncture site play a role in the agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution measurements?
    Schramm S; Albrecht E; Frascarolo P; Chassot PG; Spahn DR
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2010 Apr; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 19700347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arterial pressure waveform analysis versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement during open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective observational study.
    Montenij LJ; Buhre WF; de Jong SA; Harms JH; van Herwaarden JA; Kruitwagen CL; de Waal EE
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25303970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of smartphone application-based vital sign monitors without external hardware versus those used in clinical practice: a prospective trial.
    Alexander JC; Minhajuddin A; Joshi GP
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):825-831. PubMed ID: 27170014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
    Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy, Precision, and Trending Ability of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis of Cardiac Output in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function: A Prospective, Observational Study.
    Montenij LJ; Sonneveld JP; Nierich AP; Buhre WF; De Waal EE
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jan; 30(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 26520028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between plethysmographic waveform changes and hemodynamic variables in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated patients undergoing continuous cardiac output monitoring.
    Thiele RH; Colquhoun DA; Patrie J; Nie SH; Huffmyer JL
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1044-50. PubMed ID: 21924629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jun; 112(6):1024-31. PubMed ID: 24531685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the agreement between photoplethysmographic and arterial waveform respiratory variation in patients undergoing spine surgery.
    Thiele RH; Colquhoun DA; Forkin KT; Durieux ME
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Oct; 37(7):409-15. PubMed ID: 23941460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.