1046 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28002557)
1. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.
Lepomäki M; Karhunen-Enckell U; Tuominen J; Kronqvist P; Oksala N; Murtola T; Roine A
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):577-588. PubMed ID: 34779520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extent of ductal carcinoma in situ according to breast cancer subtypes: a population-based cohort study.
Doebar SC; van den Broek EC; Koppert LB; Jager A; Baaijens MHA; Obdeijn IAM; van Deurzen CHM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):179-187. PubMed ID: 27318854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Randomized Prospective Trial of Supine MRI-Guided Versus Wire-Localized Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
Barth RJ; Krishnaswamy V; Paulsen KD; Rooney TB; Wells WA; Angeles CV; Zuurbier RA; Rosenkranz K; Poplack S; Tosteson TD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3099-3108. PubMed ID: 31359283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas.
Lovrics PJ; Goldsmith CH; Hodgson N; McCready D; Gohla G; Boylan C; Cornacchi S; Reedijk M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3407-14. PubMed ID: 21533657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Chauhan H; Jiwa N; Nagarajan VR; Thiruchelvam P; Hogben K; Al-Mufti R; Hadjiminas D; Shousha S; Cutress R; Ashrafian H; Takats Z; Leff DR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):3939-3947. PubMed ID: 38520579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery.
O'Sullivan MJ; Li T; Freedman G; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3133-40. PubMed ID: 17653798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Rosenberger LH; Mamtani A; Fuzesi S; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3239-46. PubMed ID: 27411549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive Factors for Positive Margin and the Surgical Learning Curve in Non-Palpable Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Localization - Prospective Study of 214 Consecutive Patients.
Tóth D; Varga Z; Sebő É; Török M; Kovács I
Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Jan; 22(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 26522009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Hughes L; Hamm J; McGahan C; Baliski C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):656-664. PubMed ID: 27718033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
