These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28003256)

  • 1. Recycler: an algorithm for detecting plasmids from de novo assembly graphs.
    Rozov R; Brown Kav A; Bogumil D; Shterzer N; Halperin E; Mizrahi I; Shamir R
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):475-482. PubMed ID: 28003256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SCAPP: an algorithm for improved plasmid assembly in metagenomes.
    Pellow D; Zorea A; Probst M; Furman O; Segal A; Mizrahi I; Shamir R
    Microbiome; 2021 Jun; 9(1):144. PubMed ID: 34172093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Faucet: streaming de novo assembly graph construction.
    Rozov R; Goldshlager G; Halperin E; Shamir R
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 34(1):147-154. PubMed ID: 29036597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the (im)possibility of reconstructing plasmids from whole-genome short-read sequencing data.
    Arredondo-Alonso S; Willems RJ; van Schaik W; Schürch AC
    Microb Genom; 2017 Oct; 3(10):e000128. PubMed ID: 29177087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MeCorS: Metagenome-enabled error correction of single cell sequencing reads.
    Bremges A; Singer E; Woyke T; Sczyrba A
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 32(14):2199-201. PubMed ID: 27153586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NeatFreq: reference-free data reduction and coverage normalization for De Novo sequence assembly.
    McCorrison JM; Venepally P; Singh I; Fouts DE; Lasken RS; Methé BA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):357. PubMed ID: 25407910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A spectral algorithm for fast de novo layout of uncorrected long nanopore reads.
    Recanati A; Brüls T; d'Aspremont A
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 33(20):3188-3194. PubMed ID: 28605450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graph mining for next generation sequencing: leveraging the assembly graph for biological insights.
    Warnke-Sommer J; Ali H
    BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():340. PubMed ID: 27154001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of de-novo assembly tools for plasmid metagenome analysis.
    Gupta SK; Raza S; Unno T
    Genes Genomics; 2019 Sep; 41(9):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 31187446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SAGE2: parallel human genome assembly.
    Molnar M; Haghshenas E; Ilie L
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(4):678-680. PubMed ID: 29045591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3CAC: improving the classification of phages and plasmids in metagenomic assemblies using assembly graphs.
    Pu L; Shamir R
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(Suppl_2):ii56-ii61. PubMed ID: 36124804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads.
    Wick RR; Judd LM; Gorrie CL; Holt KE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 13(6):e1005595. PubMed ID: 28594827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. COCACOLA: binning metagenomic contigs using sequence COmposition, read CoverAge, CO-alignment and paired-end read LinkAge.
    Lu YY; Chen T; Fuhrman JA; Sun F
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 33(6):791-798. PubMed ID: 27256312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GRASS: a generic algorithm for scaffolding next-generation sequencing assemblies.
    Gritsenko AA; Nijkamp JF; Reinders MJ; de Ridder D
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(11):1429-37. PubMed ID: 22492642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FinisherSC: a repeat-aware tool for upgrading de novo assembly using long reads.
    Lam KK; LaButti K; Khalak A; Tse D
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3207-9. PubMed ID: 26040454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybracter: enabling scalable, automated, complete and accurate bacterial genome assemblies.
    Bouras G; Houtak G; Wick RR; Mallawaarachchi V; Roach MJ; Papudeshi B; Judd LM; Sheppard AE; Edwards RA; Vreugde S
    Microb Genom; 2024 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 38717808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HyAsP, a greedy tool for plasmids identification.
    Müller R; Chauve C
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(21):4436-4439. PubMed ID: 31116364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MATAM: reconstruction of phylogenetic marker genes from short sequencing reads in metagenomes.
    Pericard P; Dufresne Y; Couderc L; Blanquart S; Touzet H
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 29040406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subset selection of high-depth next generation sequencing reads for de novo genome assembly using MapReduce framework.
    Fang CH; Chang YJ; Chung WC; Hsieh PH; Lin CY; Ho JM
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S9. PubMed ID: 26678408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CSAR: a contig scaffolding tool using algebraic rearrangements.
    Chen KT; Liu CL; Huang SH; Shen HT; Shieh YK; Chiu HT; Lu CL
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 34(1):109-111. PubMed ID: 28968788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.