These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28003393)

  • 1. Revisiting the Decision of Death in Hurst v. Florida.
    Cooke BK; Ginory A; Zedalis J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 28003393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hall v. Florida: Capital Punishment, IQ, and Persons With Intellectual Disabilities.
    Cooke BK; Delalot D; Werner TL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 26071514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
    Abeles N
    Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ferguson v. Florida: rationally understanding competence to be executed?
    Wadsworth CS; Newman WJ; Burton PR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 24986351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.
    Herbert PB; Meyers JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 15704630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Death penalty support for special offender populations of legally convicted murderers: juveniles, the mentally retarded, and the mentally incompetent.
    Boots DP; Heide KM; Cochran JK
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):223-38. PubMed ID: 15048861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shifting Diagnostic Systems for Defining Intellectual Disability in Death Penalty Cases: Hall vs. Florida.
    Mukherjee M; Westphal A
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2015 Jul; 45(7):2277-8. PubMed ID: 25663625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When domestic goes capital: Juror decision making in capital murder trials involving domestic homicide.
    Richards TN; Smith MD; Fogel SJ; Bjerregaard B
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 25844513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth.
    Siegel DM
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 21683911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hall v. Florida: defining intellectual disability in the shadow of the death penalty.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2014 Oct; 65(10):1186-8. PubMed ID: 25270493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life or death: A qualitative examination of mitigating and aggravating evidence presented in capital trials.
    Holleran LB
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(6):463-487. PubMed ID: 37823614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 31533993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession.
    Kermani EJ; Kantor JE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8193393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials.
    Butler BM; Moran G
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Apr; 26(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 11985297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individualizing justice after Atkins.
    Brakel SJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 16585243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dementia and the Death Penalty.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Nov; 49(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 31813185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conceptual and Scientific Defects in the Supreme Court's "Method of Execution" Jurisprudence.
    Dow DR; Newberry JR
    Yale J Biol Med; 2019 Dec; 92(4):793-803. PubMed ID: 31866796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.