353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28004226)
1. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of 3D finite element models from simulated DXA images for biofidelic simulations of sideways fall impact to the hip.
Grassi L; Fleps I; Sahlstedt H; Väänänen SP; Ferguson SJ; Isaksson H; Helgason B
Bone; 2021 Jan; 142():115678. PubMed ID: 33022451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D-DXA Based Finite Element Modelling for Femur Strength Prediction: Evaluation Against QCT.
Qasim M; López Picazo M; Ruiz Wills C; Noailly J; Di Gregorio S; Del Río Barquero LM; Malouf Sierra J; Humbert L
J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(2):101471. PubMed ID: 38306806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical shape and appearance models for fast and automated estimation of proximal femur fracture load using 2D finite element models.
Sarkalkan N; Waarsing JH; Bos PK; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):3107-14. PubMed ID: 25052137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D Finite Element Models Reconstructed From 2D Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Images Improve Hip Fracture Prediction Compared to Areal BMD in Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Sweden Cohort.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Jehpsson L; Ljunggren Ö; Rosengren BE; Karlsson MK; Isaksson H
J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1258-1267. PubMed ID: 37417707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical note: comparison between single and multiview simulated DXA configurations for reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur.
Humbert L; Whitmarsh T; Craene MD; Del Río Barquero LM; Frangi AF
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5272-6. PubMed ID: 22894452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA.
Cody DD; Gross GJ; Hou FJ; Spencer HJ; Goldstein SA; Fyhrie DP
J Biomech; 1999 Oct; 32(10):1013-20. PubMed ID: 10476839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Oct; 51(4):737-40. PubMed ID: 22796418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 2D-3D reconstruction of the proximal femur from DXA scans: Evaluation of the 3D-Shaper software.
Dudle A; Gugler Y; Pretterklieber M; Ferrari S; Lippuner K; Zysset P
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1111020. PubMed ID: 36937766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis.
Dragomir-Daescu D; Rezaei A; Uthamaraj S; Rossman T; Bronk JT; Bolander M; Lambert V; McEligot S; Entwistle R; Giambini H; Jasiuk I; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
J Vis Exp; 2017 Mar; (121):. PubMed ID: 28362373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of 3D shape, internal density and mechanics of proximal femur by combining bone mineral density images with shape and density templates.
Väänänen SP; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jul; 11(6):791-800. PubMed ID: 21986796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-dose and sparse sampling MDCT-based femoral bone strength prediction using finite element analysis.
Rayudu NM; Anitha DP; Mei K; Zoffl F; Kopp FK; Sollmann N; Löffler MT; Kirschke JS; Noël PB; Subburaj K; Baum T
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Feb; 15(1):17. PubMed ID: 32088769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A preliminary dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based finite element model for assessing osteoporotic hip fracture risk.
Luo Y; Ferdous Z; Leslie WD
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Dec; 225(12):1188-95. PubMed ID: 22320058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image.
Väänänen SP; Isaksson H; Julkunen P; Sirola J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 20809392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comprehensive evaluation of PCA-based finite element modelling of the human femur.
Grassi L; Schileo E; Boichon C; Viceconti M; Taddei F
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Oct; 36(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 25128959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur.
Langton CM; Pisharody S; Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 19230742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
