353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28004226)
21. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of femur positioning on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures and statistical shape and appearance modeling (SSAM) fracture risk assessments.
Ammar A; Jazinizadeh F; Adachi JD; Quenneville CE
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Jan; 238(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 38112093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur--prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA.
Baum T; Carballido-Gamio J; Huber MB; Müller D; Monetti R; Räth C; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Rummeny EJ; Link TM; Bauer JS
Osteoporos Int; 2010 Sep; 21(9):1553-64. PubMed ID: 19859642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of an open-source measurement system to assess the areal bone mineral density of the proximal femur from clinical CT images.
Uemura K; Otake Y; Takao M; Makino H; Soufi M; Iwasa M; Sugano N; Sato Y
Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jan; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 35038079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Distal skeletal tibia assessed by HR-pQCT is highly correlated with femoral and lumbar vertebra failure loads.
Kroker A; Plett R; Nishiyama KK; McErlain DD; Sandino C; Boyd SK
J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():43-49. PubMed ID: 28558915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.
Huber MB; Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Baum T; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18430879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) based on routine MDCT imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures.
Liebl H; Garcia EG; Holzner F; Noel PB; Burgkart R; Rummeny EJ; Baum T; Bauer JS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116907. PubMed ID: 25723187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automation of a DXA-based finite element tool for clinical assessment of hip fracture risk.
Luo Y; Ahmed S; Leslie WD
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():75-83. PubMed ID: 29512506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of DXA-based finite element analysis of the proximal femur in a longitudinal study of hip fracture.
Naylor KE; McCloskey EV; Eastell R; Yang L
J Bone Miner Res; 2013 May; 28(5):1014-21. PubMed ID: 23281096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Whitmarsh T; Humbert L; De Craene M; Del Rio Barquero LM; Frangi AF
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2101-14. PubMed ID: 21803681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How accurately can subject-specific finite element models predict strains and strength of human femora? Investigation using full-field measurements.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):802-806. PubMed ID: 26944687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting mechanical characteristics of rat femur.
Järvinen TL; Sievänen H; Kannus P; Järvinen M
Bone; 1998 May; 22(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 9600791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How accurately can we predict the fracture load of the proximal femur using finite element models?
van den Munckhof S; Zadpoor AA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Apr; 29(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 24485865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel methodology for generating 3D finite element models of the hip from 2D radiographs.
Thevenot J; Koivumäki J; Kuhn V; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 24290135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient-specific finite element estimated femur strength as a predictor of the risk of hip fracture: the effect of methodological determinants.
Qasim M; Farinella G; Zhang J; Li X; Yang L; Eastell R; Viceconti M
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Sep; 27(9):2815-2822. PubMed ID: 27108118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of non-invasive assessments of strength of the proximal femur.
Johannesdottir F; Thrall E; Muller J; Keaveny TM; Kopperdahl DL; Bouxsein ML
Bone; 2017 Dec; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 28739416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 3D Analysis of the Proximal Femur Compared to 2D Analysis for Hip Fracture Risk Prediction in a Clinical Population.
Jazinizadeh F; Quenneville CE
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Apr; 49(4):1222-1232. PubMed ID: 33123827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 3D patient-specific finite element models of the proximal femur based on DXA towards the classification of fracture and non-fracture cases.
Ruiz Wills C; Olivares AL; Tassani S; Ceresa M; Zimmer V; González Ballester MA; Del Río LM; Humbert L; Noailly J
Bone; 2019 Apr; 121():89-99. PubMed ID: 30611923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strength Clinically Useful?
Viceconti M; Qasim M; Bhattacharya P; Li X
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2018 Jun; 16(3):216-223. PubMed ID: 29656377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
