328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28004246)
1. Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Schoenarts N; Khonsari RH; Odri GA; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2407-2414. PubMed ID: 28004246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.
Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional architectural and structural analysis--a transition in concept and design from Delaire's cephalometric analysis.
Lee SH; Kil TJ; Park KR; Kim BC; Kim JG; Piao Z; Corre P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 43(9):1154-60. PubMed ID: 24794759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Liberton DK; Verma P; Contratto A; Lee JS
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):e611-e615. PubMed ID: 31478954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenges in measuring angles between craniofacial structures.
Yatabe M; Gomes L; Ruellas AC; Lopinto J; Macron L; Paniagua B; Budin F; Prieto JC; Ioshida M; Cevidanes L
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 27():e20180380. PubMed ID: 31166412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses.
Olszewski R; Tanesy O; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 38(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 19574058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro.
Olszewski R; Zech F; Cosnard G; Nicolas V; Macq B; Reychler H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 36(9):828-33. PubMed ID: 17825530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography.
Kwon TG; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15925488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis.
Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility assessment of Delaire cephalometric analysis using reconstructions from computed tomography.
Debelmas A; Ketoff S; Lanciaux S; Corre P; Friess M; Khonsari RH
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 121(1):35-39. PubMed ID: 31055092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system.
Kitaura H; Yonetsu K; Kitamori H; Kobayashi K; Nakamura T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 10912713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
