These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28004789)

  • 1. Assessment of turbulent viscous stress using ICOSA 4D Flow MRI for prediction of hemodynamic blood damage.
    Ha H; Lantz J; Haraldsson H; Casas B; Ziegler M; Karlsson M; Saloner D; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39773. PubMed ID: 28004789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward an accurate estimation of wall shear stress from 4D flow magnetic resonance downstream of a severe stenosis.
    Corso P; Walheim J; Dillinger H; Giannakopoulos G; Gülan U; Frouzakis CE; Kozerke S; Holzner M
    Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1531-1543. PubMed ID: 33914962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of turbulent kinetic energy using 4D phase-contrast MRI: Effect of scan parameters and target vessel size.
    Ha H; Hwang D; Kim GB; Kweon J; Lee SJ; Baek J; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):715-723. PubMed ID: 26968139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of Reynolds stress components and turbulent pressure loss using 4D flow MRI with extended motion encoding.
    Haraldsson H; Kefayati S; Ahn S; Dyverfeldt P; Lantz J; Karlsson M; Laub G; Ebbers T; Saloner D
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):1962-1971. PubMed ID: 28745409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the accuracy of viscous and turbulent loss quantification in stenotic aortic flow using phase-contrast MRI.
    Binter C; Gülan U; Holzner M; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jul; 76(1):191-6. PubMed ID: 26258402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of pressure drop assessment using 4D flow MRI-based turbulence production in various shapes of aortic stenoses.
    Ha H; Kvitting JP; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):893-906. PubMed ID: 30252155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synthesis of patient-specific multipoint 4D flow MRI data of turbulent aortic flow downstream of stenotic valves.
    Dirix P; Buoso S; Peper ES; Kozerke S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16004. PubMed ID: 36163357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics.
    Kweon J; Yang DH; Kim GB; Kim N; Paek M; Stalder AF; Greiser A; Kim YH
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3588-97. PubMed ID: 26747263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9.
    Ha H; Huh HK; Park KJ; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T; Kim DH; Yang DH
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():774954. PubMed ID: 34950643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear-scaling-based approach for irreversible energy loss estimation in stenotic aortic flow - An in vitro study.
    Gülan U; Binter C; Kozerke S; Holzner M
    J Biomech; 2017 May; 56():89-96. PubMed ID: 28342532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Models of flow-induced loading on blood cells in laminar and turbulent flow, with application to cardiovascular device flow.
    Quinlan NJ; Dooley PN
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 35(8):1347-56. PubMed ID: 17458700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laminar-to-turbulence and relaminarization zones detection by simulation of low Reynolds number turbulent blood flow in large stenosed arteries.
    Tabe R; Ghalichi F; Hossainpour S; Ghasemzadeh K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 Aug; 27(2-3):119-29. PubMed ID: 27567769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of turbulent viscous shear stress on red blood cell hemolysis.
    Yen JH; Chen SF; Chern MK; Lu PC
    J Artif Organs; 2014 Jun; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 24619800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro experiments on ICOSA6 4D flow MRI measurement for the quantification of velocity and turbulence parameters.
    Ha H; Park KJ; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T; Yang DH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 72():49-60. PubMed ID: 32619720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel and facile criterion to assess the accuracy of WSS estimation by 4D flow MRI.
    Ko S; Yang B; Cho JH; Lee J; Song S
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Apr; 53():95-103. PubMed ID: 30743192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of turbulent flow effects on the vessel wall using four-dimensional flow MRI.
    Ziegler M; Lantz J; Ebbers T; Dyverfeldt P
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jun; 77(6):2310-2319. PubMed ID: 27350049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 4D Flow MRI quantification of blood flow patterns, turbulence and pressure drop in normal and stenotic prosthetic heart valves.
    Ha H; Kvitting JP; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 55():118-127. PubMed ID: 30266627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-dimensional color-mapping of turbulent shear stress distribution downstream of two aortic bioprosthetic valves in vitro.
    Nygaard H; Giersiepen M; Hasenkam JM; Reul H; Paulsen PK; Rovsing PE; Westphal D
    J Biomech; 1992 Apr; 25(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 1583021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fundamentals of turbulent flow spectrum imaging.
    Dillinger H; McGrath C; Guenthner C; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1231-1249. PubMed ID: 34786764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of Transitional and Turbulent Flow Through the FDA Benchmark Nozzle Model Using Laser Doppler Velocimetry.
    Taylor JO; Good BC; Paterno AV; Hariharan P; Deutsch S; Malinauskas RA; Manning KB
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2016 Sep; 7(3):191-209. PubMed ID: 27350137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.