176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28004838)
21. Nucleotide diversity inflation as a genome-wide response to experimental lifespan extension in Drosophila melanogaster.
Michalak P; Kang L; Sarup PM; Schou MF; Loeschcke V
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):84. PubMed ID: 28088192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genome-Wide Analysis of Starvation-Selected Drosophila melanogaster-A Genetic Model of Obesity.
Hardy CM; Burke MK; Everett LJ; Han MV; Lantz KM; Gibbs AG
Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):50-65. PubMed ID: 29309688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Whole-genome sequencing of two North American Drosophila melanogaster populations reveals genetic differentiation and positive selection.
Campo D; Lehmann K; Fjeldsted C; Souaiaia T; Kao J; Nuzhdin SV
Mol Ecol; 2013 Oct; 22(20):5084-97. PubMed ID: 24102956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On the maintenance of genetic variation and adaptation to environmental change: considerations from population genomics in fishes.
Bernatchez L
J Fish Biol; 2016 Dec; 89(6):2519-2556. PubMed ID: 27687146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Direct observation of adaptive tracking on ecological time scales in
Rudman SM; Greenblum SI; Rajpurohit S; Betancourt NJ; Hanna J; Tilk S; Yokoyama T; Petrov DA; Schmidt P
Science; 2022 Mar; 375(6586):eabj7484. PubMed ID: 35298245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.
Vy HM; Kim Y
Genetics; 2015 Jun; 200(2):633-49. PubMed ID: 25911658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps.
Jensen JD
Nat Commun; 2014 Oct; 5():5281. PubMed ID: 25345443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. African sequence variation accounts for most of the sequence polymorphism in non-African Drosophila melanogaster.
Schöfl G; Catania F; Nolte V; Schlötterer C
Genetics; 2005 Aug; 170(4):1701-9. PubMed ID: 15937137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: assessment with hemiclonal analysis.
Rice WR; Linder JE; Friberg U; Lew TA; Morrow EH; Stewart AD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 May; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):6527-34. PubMed ID: 15851669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Maximum SNP FST Outperforms Full-Window Statistics for Detecting Soft Sweeps in Local Adaptation.
da Silva Ribeiro T; Galván JA; Pool JE
Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 36152314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Population Genomic Assessment of Three Decades of Evolution in a Natural Drosophila Population.
Lange JD; Bastide H; Lack JB; Pool JE
Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Feb; 39(2):. PubMed ID: 34971382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A guide for the design of evolve and resequencing studies.
Kofler R; Schlötterer C
Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Feb; 31(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 24214537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A genome-wide scan shows evidence for local adaptation in a widespread keystone Neotropical forest tree.
Collevatti RG; Novaes E; Silva-Junior OB; Vieira LD; Lima-Ribeiro MS; Grattapaglia D
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Aug; 123(2):117-137. PubMed ID: 30755734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation.
Teotónio H; Chelo IM; Bradić M; Rose MR; Long AD
Nat Genet; 2009 Feb; 41(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 19136954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microbiome composition shapes rapid genomic adaptation of
Rudman SM; Greenblum S; Hughes RC; Rajpurohit S; Kiratli O; Lowder DB; Lemmon SG; Petrov DA; Chaston JM; Schmidt P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Oct; 116(40):20025-20032. PubMed ID: 31527278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and Divergence Among Replicate Selected Drosophila Lines.
Griffin PC; Hangartner SB; Fournier-Level A; Hoffmann AA
Genetics; 2017 Feb; 205(2):871-890. PubMed ID: 28007884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Complexities of recapitulating polygenic effects in natural populations: replication of genetic effects on wing shape in artificially selected and wild-caught populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Pelletier K; Pitchers WR; Mammel A; Northrop-Albrecht E; Márquez EJ; Moscarella RA; Houle D; Dworkin I
Genetics; 2023 Jul; 224(3):. PubMed ID: 36961731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recombination Alters the Dynamics of Adaptation on Standing Variation in Laboratory Yeast Populations.
Kosheleva K; Desai MM
Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):180-201. PubMed ID: 29069452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patterns and processes of genome-wide divergence between North American and African Drosophila melanogaster.
Yukilevich R; Turner TL; Aoki F; Nuzhdin SV; True JR
Genetics; 2010 Sep; 186(1):219-39. PubMed ID: 20551441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
