340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28005153)
21. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Adenocarcinoma.
Ergül N; Yilmaz Güneş B; Yücetaş U; Toktaş MG; Çermik TF
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 43(12):e422-e427. PubMed ID: 30273204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Early dynamic imaging in
Uprimny C; Kroiss AS; Decristoforo C; Fritz J; Warwitz B; Scarpa L; Roig LG; Kendler D; von Guggenberg E; Bektic J; Horninger W; Virgolini IJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 May; 44(5):765-775. PubMed ID: 27900519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23.
Calais J; Czernin J; Cao M; Kishan AU; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; Sandler K; Chu FI; King CR; Steinberg ML; Rauscher I; Schmidt-Hegemann NS; Poeppel T; Hetkamp P; Ceci F; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Nickols NG
J Nucl Med; 2018 Feb; 59(2):230-237. PubMed ID: 29123013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Is there a utility of adding skeletal imaging to 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/computed tomography in initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer?
Raju S; Sharma A; Patel C; Sahoo R; Das CJ; Kumar S; Sharma A; Kumar R
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Nov; 41(11):1183-1188. PubMed ID: 32796451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25.
Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection rate of PET/CT in patients with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer using [
Berliner C; Tienken M; Frenzel T; Kobayashi Y; Helberg A; Kirchner U; Klutmann S; Beyersdorff D; Budäus L; Wester HJ; Mester J; Bannas P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Apr; 44(4):670-677. PubMed ID: 27896369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI versus
Muehlematter UJ; Burger IA; Becker AS; Schawkat K; Hötker AM; Reiner CS; Müller J; Rupp NJ; Rüschoff JH; Eberli D; Donati OF
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):350-358. PubMed ID: 31502937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Whole-Body Integrated [
Guberina N; Hetkamp P; Ruebben H; Fendler W; Grueneisen J; Suntharalingam S; Kirchner J; Puellen L; Harke N; Radtke JP; Umutlu L; Hadaschik BA; Herrmann K; Forsting M; Wetter A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Jun; 22(3):788-796. PubMed ID: 31482413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29.
Caroli P; Sandler I; Matteucci F; De Giorgi U; Uccelli L; Celli M; Foca F; Barone D; Romeo A; Sarnelli A; Paganelli G
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2035-2044. PubMed ID: 29922948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer.
Afshar-Oromieh A; Avtzi E; Giesel FL; Holland-Letz T; Linhart HG; Eder M; Eisenhut M; Boxler S; Hadaschik BA; Kratochwil C; Weichert W; Kopka K; Debus J; Haberkorn U
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Feb; 42(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 25411132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Satapathy S; Singh H; Kumar R; Mittal BR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 32755196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 dynamic PET/CT imaging in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer.
Sachpekidis C; Eder M; Kopka K; Mier W; Hadaschik BA; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Jul; 43(7):1288-99. PubMed ID: 26753602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Potential Impact of
Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT in the pretreatment staging of primary prostate cancer.
Meyrick DP; Asokendaran M; Skelly LA; Lenzo NP; Henderson A
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):956-963. PubMed ID: 28922335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived quantitative volumetric tumor parameters for classification and evaluation of therapeutic response of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.
Schmidkonz C; Cordes M; Goetz TI; Prante O; Kuwert T; Ritt P; Uder M; Wullich B; Goebell P; Bäuerle T
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):766-775. PubMed ID: 31338731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection Rate and Localization of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using
Kranzbühler B; Müller J; Becker AS; Garcia Schüler HI; Muehlematter U; Fankhauser CD; Kedzia S; Guckenberger M; Kaufmann PA; Eberli D; Burger IA
J Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 61(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 31375566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic performance of
Afshar-Oromieh A; Holland-Letz T; Giesel FL; Kratochwil C; Mier W; Haufe S; Debus N; Eder M; Eisenhut M; Schäfer M; Neels O; Hohenfellner M; Kopka K; Kauczor HU; Debus J; Haberkorn U
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(8):1258-1268. PubMed ID: 28497198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature.
Luiting HB; van Leeuwen PJ; Busstra MB; Brabander T; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Vis AN; Emmett L; Stricker PD; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical performance of
Kranzbühler B; Nagel H; Becker AS; Müller J; Huellner M; Stolzmann P; Muehlematter U; Guckenberger M; Kaufmann PA; Eberli D; Burger IA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jan; 45(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 29032394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and
Sawicki LM; Kirchner J; Buddensieck C; Antke C; Ullrich T; Schimmöller L; Boos J; Schleich C; Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Heusch P; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Müller HW; Hautzel H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 30879122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
