134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28005657)
1. Influence of Orbital Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution: A Finite Element Analysis.
Xing Z; Chen LS; Peng W; Chen LJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 28(2):e117-e120. PubMed ID: 28005657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
Himmlová L; Dostálová T; Kácovský A; Konvicková S
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 14739889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stress induced by different lengths of osseointegrated implants in the anterior maxilla.
Lee JS; Lim YJ
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(11):1143-9. PubMed ID: 22397684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of orbital implant lengths on stress distributions in peri-implant surfaces].
Xing Z; Songling C; Yun Z; Liuying Q
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 32(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 25490828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Li D; Hou R; Yang J; Liu B
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 18205741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
