291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28005754)
21. Custom porous polyethylene implants for large-scale pediatric skull reconstruction: early outcomes.
Lin AY; Kinsella CR; Rottgers SA; Smith DM; Grunwaldt LJ; Cooper GM; Losee JE
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 22337376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population.
Fu KJ; Barr RM; Kerr ML; Shah MN; Fletcher SA; Sandberg DI; Teichgraeber JF; Greives MR
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 27035597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical Outcomes After Cranioplasty With Titanium Mesh, Polyetheretherketone, or Composite Bone Cement: A Retrospective Study.
Chen K; Liang W; Zhu Q; Shen H; Yang Y; Li Y; Li H; Wang Y; Qian R
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 34(8):2246-2251. PubMed ID: 37470720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cranioplasty Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants for Skull Defects.
Park EK; Lim JY; Yun IS; Kim JS; Woo SH; Kim DS; Shim KW
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):943-9. PubMed ID: 27192643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Polyetheretherketone implants for the repair of large cranial defects: a 3-center experience.
Rosenthal G; Ng I; Moscovici S; Lee KK; Lay T; Martin C; Manley GT
Neurosurgery; 2014 Nov; 75(5):523-9; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 24979096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty.
Honeybul S; Morrison DA; Ho KM; Lind CR; Geelhoed E
J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 26991387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cranial reconstruction with prefabricated 3D implant after a gunshot injury: A case report.
Malivuković A; Novaković N; Lepić M; Minić L; Stepić N; Đorđević B; Rasulić L
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug; 73(8):783-7. PubMed ID: 29328616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
Ng ZY; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Skull Bone Defects Reconstruction with Custom-Made Titanium Graft shaped with Electron Beam Melting Technology: Preliminary Experience in a Series of Ten Patients.
Francaviglia N; Maugeri R; Odierna Contino A; Meli F; Fiorenza V; Costantino G; Giammalva RG; Iacopino DG
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2017; 124():137-141. PubMed ID: 28120065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cranioplasty Using a Mixture of Biologic and Nonbiologic Agents.
Arnaoutakis D; Bahrami A; Cohn JE; Smith JE
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 20(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 29098278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient-Specific Titanium-Reinforced Calcium Phosphate Implant for the Repair and Healing of Complex Cranial Defects.
Kihlström Burenstam Linder L; Birgersson U; Lundgren K; Illies C; Engstrand T
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e399-e407. PubMed ID: 30342265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty.
O'Reilly EB; Barnett S; Madden C; Welch B; Mickey B; Rozen S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Mar; 68(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25541423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implants for cranioplasty.
Gladstone HB; McDermott MW; Cooke DD
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Apr; 28(2):381-400. PubMed ID: 7596618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reconstruction of cranioplasty using medpor porouspolyethylene implant.
Marlier B; Kleiber JC; Bannwarth M; Theret E; Eap C; Litre CF
Neurochirurgie; 2017 Dec; 63(6):468-472. PubMed ID: 29122305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for repair of craniofacial defects.
Rammos CK; Cayci C; Castro-Garcia JA; Feiz-Erfan I; Lettieri SC
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):631-3. PubMed ID: 25901667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cranioplasty with Porous Hydroxyapatite Custom-Made Bone Flap: Results from a Multicenter Study Enrolling 149 Patients Over 15 Years.
Fricia M; Nicolosi F; Ganau M; Cebula H; Todeschi J; Santin MDN; Nannavecchia B; Morselli C; Chibbaro S
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 121():160-165. PubMed ID: 30315976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Outcomes of Cranioplasty with Preformed Titanium versus Freehand Molded Polymethylmethacrylate Implants.
Höhne J; Werzmirzowsky K; Ott C; Hohenberger C; Hassanin BG; Brawanski A; Schebesch KM
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 May; 79(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 28800664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Custom-made titanium cranioplasty: early and late complications of 151 cranioplasties and review of the literature.
Williams LR; Fan KF; Bentley RP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):599-608. PubMed ID: 25482456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of a 3D Skull Model to Improve Accuracy in Cranioplasty for Autologous Flap Resorption in a 3-Year-Old Child.
Maduri R; Viaroli E; Levivier M; Daniel RT; Messerer M
Pediatr Neurosurg; 2017; 52(5):351-355. PubMed ID: 28848112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Custom CAD/CAM implants for complex craniofacial reconstruction in children: Our experience based on 136 cases
Nguyen PD; Khechoyan DY; Phillips JH; Forrest CR
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Nov; 71(11):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 30220563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
