BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28007879)

  • 21. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimally Invasive Versus Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Matched Study.
    Terwelp MD; Thourani VH; Zhao Y; Balan P; Loghin C; Ocazionez D; Estrera A; Hoffmann CT; Babaliaros VC; Lamelas J; Nguyen TC
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Mar; 26(2):146-154. PubMed ID: 28820543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transcatheter vs surgical aortic-valve replacement in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk candidates: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Khan SU; Lone AN; Saleem MA; Kaluski E
    Clin Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 40(11):974-981. PubMed ID: 29168984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meta-Analysis Comparing Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Zhang X; Wang T; Lan R; Dai Q; Kang L; Wang L; Wang Y; Xu W; Xu B
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 125(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 31780077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conventional surgery, sutureless valves, and transapical aortic valve replacement: what is the best option for patients with aortic valve stenosis? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis.
    D'Onofrio A; Rizzoli G; Messina A; Alfieri O; Lorusso R; Salizzoni S; Glauber M; Di Bartolomeo R; Besola L; Rinaldi M; Troise G; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1065-70; discussion 1070-1. PubMed ID: 24021955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chronological comparison of TAVI and SAVR stratified to surgical risk: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
    Park DY; An S; Kassab K; Jolly N; Attanasio S; Sawaqed R; Malhotra S; Doukky R; Vij A
    Acta Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 78(7):778-789. PubMed ID: 37294002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for nonagenarians.
    Elgendy IY; Mahmoud AN; Elbadawi A; Elgendy AY; Omer MA; Megaly M; Mojadidi MK; Jneid H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):989-995. PubMed ID: 30569661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with non-high surgical risk severe aortic stenosis: A systematic review.
    Enezate TH; Kumar A; Fadel MA; Patel M; Al Dadah A; Omran J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(5S1):S40-S48. PubMed ID: 28410995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.
    Mack MJ; Leon MB; Smith CR; Miller DC; Moses JW; Tuzcu EM; Webb JG; Douglas PS; Anderson WN; Blackstone EH; Kodali SK; Makkar RR; Fontana GP; Kapadia S; Bavaria J; Hahn RT; Thourani VH; Babaliaros V; Pichard A; Herrmann HC; Brown DL; Williams M; Akin J; Davidson MJ; Svensson LG;
    Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9986):2477-84. PubMed ID: 25788234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Khan AR; Khan S; Riaz H; Luni FK; Simo H; Bin Abdulhak A; Bavishi C; Flaherty M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):934-944. PubMed ID: 26946091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 3-Year Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Deeb GM; Reardon MJ; Chetcuti S; Patel HJ; Grossman PM; Yakubov SJ; Kleiman NS; Coselli JS; Gleason TG; Lee JS; Hermiller JB; Heiser J; Merhi W; Zorn GL; Tadros P; Robinson N; Petrossian G; Hughes GC; Harrison JK; Maini B; Mumtaz M; Conte J; Resar J; Aharonian V; Pfeffer T; Oh JK; Qiao H; Adams DH; Popma JJ;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 67(22):2565-74. PubMed ID: 27050187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.
    Ando T; Adegbala O; Villablanca PA; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Grines CL; Schreiber T; Nazif T; Kodali S; Afonso L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):954-962. PubMed ID: 30408309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Five-Year Outcomes of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in a Real World Population.
    Barbanti M; Tamburino C; D'Errigo P; Biancari F; Ranucci M; Rosato S; Santoro G; Fusco D; Seccareccia F;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(7):e007825. PubMed ID: 31284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Causes of death in intermediate-risk patients: The Randomized Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Trial.
    Amrane H; Deeb GM; Popma JJ; Yakubov SJ; Gleason TG; Van Mieghem NM; Reardon MJ;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Sep; 158(3):718-728.e3. PubMed ID: 30709668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Better Than Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis.
    Ando T; Adegbala O; Akintoye E; Ashraf S; Pahuja M; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Grines CL; Afonso L; Schreiber T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Apr; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 29606641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis.
    Thourani VH; Kodali S; Makkar RR; Herrmann HC; Williams M; Babaliaros V; Smalling R; Lim S; Malaisrie SC; Kapadia S; Szeto WY; Greason KL; Kereiakes D; Ailawadi G; Whisenant BK; Devireddy C; Leipsic J; Hahn RT; Pibarot P; Weissman NJ; Jaber WA; Cohen DJ; Suri R; Tuzcu EM; Svensson LG; Webb JG; Moses JW; Mack MJ; Miller DC; Smith CR; Alu MC; Parvataneni R; D'Agostino RB; Leon MB
    Lancet; 2016 May; 387(10034):2218-25. PubMed ID: 27053442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis: A propensity matched analysis.
    Dhoble A; Bhise V; Nevah MI; Balan P; Nguyen TC; Estrera AL; Smalling RW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 28846185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comment on "1-year outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement. Results from the Italian OBSERVANT study"].
    Patrício L
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 34(11):711-2. PubMed ID: 26866133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sex-Specific Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: FDA Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Premarket Clinical Trials.
    Zusterzeel R; Mishra NK; Beydoun H; Laschinger J; Wu C; Dong LM; Lin JA; Marinac-Dabic D; Strauss DG; Caños DA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jun; 27(6):808-814. PubMed ID: 29741978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 78.