90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28008671)
1. Reliability of reporting the presence of transformation zone material in Papanicolaou smears using an automated screening system.
Erbarut Seven I; Mollamemisoglu H; Eren F
Cytopathology; 2017 Aug; 28(4):280-283. PubMed ID: 28008671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Berry M; Larson MA; Bentz JS
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 12920753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical parameters associated with absence of endocervical/transformation zone component in conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears.
Sun L; Wang PH; Lee CH; Fu TF; Chou MM; Hwang SF; Ke YM; Hsu ST; Lu CH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 26927255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Presence of endocervical cells and number of slides in cervicovaginal smears: differences in performance between gynecologists.
Celasun B
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):730-4. PubMed ID: 11575651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What are women told about Pap smears that lack endocervical cells?
Schofield MJ; Byles JE; Sanson-Fisher R
J Med Screen; 1995; 2(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 7497154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new, liquid-based cytology technique.
Weynand B; Berlière M; Haumont E; Massart F; Pourvoyeur A; Bernard P; Donnez J; Galant C
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 12685180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cytotechnologists' and cytopathologists' ASCUS rates preimplementation and postimplementation of the ThinPrep® imaging system.
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Feb; 43(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 24962256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated screening of Papanicolaou tests: A review of the literature.
Thrall MJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jan; 47(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29603675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical cancer screening performed by a nurse. Evaluation in family practice.
Thommasen H; Lenci P; Brake I; Anderson G
Can Fam Physician; 1996 Nov; 42():2179-83. PubMed ID: 8939319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of histiocyte detection in Pap smears for predicting endometrial pathology. An institutional experience.
Nassar A; Fleisher SR; Nasuti JF
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 14526675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DeepPap: Deep Convolutional Networks for Cervical Cell Classification.
Zhang L; Le Lu ; Nogues I; Summers RM; Liu S; Yao J
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Nov; 21(6):1633-1643. PubMed ID: 28541229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Martin J; Hutchinson ML
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9022724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjunctive high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option for disease risk assessment in patients with negative Papanicolaou tests without an endocervical/transformation zone sample.
Zhao C; Austin RM
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 114(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 18484643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a role for the thinprep imaging system in reporting anal cytology?
Margaret Roberts J; Jin F; Ekman D; Kay Adams M; Lindsay McDonald R; Kathleen Thurloe J; Richards A; Mary Poynten I; Law C; Kincaid Fairley C; John Hillman R; Tabrizi SN; Marie Cornall A; James Templeton D; Marie Garland S; Edwin Grulich A; Farnsworth A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 May; 44(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 26876374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
