2159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28008776)
1. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical significance of the post-radiotherapy
Jeong Y; Jung IH; Kim JS; Chang SK; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20180045. PubMed ID: 30102562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph Node With the Highest FDG Uptake Predicts Distant Metastasis-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Cho H; Kim SH; Kim H; Koh YW; Kim SH; Choi EC; Yun M
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 43(7):e220-e225. PubMed ID: 29762247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of primary gross tumor volume and standardized uptake value of
Jin YN; Yao JJ; Wang SY; Zhang WJ; Zhou GQ; Zhang F; Cheng ZB; Ma J; Mo HY; Sun Y
Tumour Biol; 2017 Jul; 39(7):1010428317717843. PubMed ID: 28671052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prognostic value of the ratio of standard uptake value of lymph node to primary tumor before treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Lou Y; Chen D; Lin Z; Sun J; Song L; Chen W; Zhang M; Chen Y
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jan; 280(1):347-356. PubMed ID: 35932312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET standardized uptake value of primary tumor and neck lymph nodes as a predictor of distant metastasis for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Hung TM; Wang HM; Kang CJ; Huang SF; Liao CT; Chan SC; Ng SH; Chen IH; Lin CY; Fan KH; Chang JT
Oral Oncol; 2013 Feb; 49(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23063613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishment of an integrated model incorporating standardised uptake value and N-classification for predicting metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Zhang Y; Li WF; Mao YP; Zhou GQ; Peng H; Sun Y; Liu Q; Chen L; Ma J
Oncotarget; 2016 Mar; 7(12):13612-20. PubMed ID: 26871291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of the Metabolic Parameters of
Wang D; Liu X; Wang W; Huo L; Pan Q; Ren X; Zhang F; Hu K
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():698744. PubMed ID: 34490094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of primary tumor and lymph node volumetric metabolic parameters at pre-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Demirel BB; Gülbahar Ateş S; Atasever Akkaş E; Göksel F; Uçmak G
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(6):367-373. PubMed ID: 37391092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Parameters of Metastatic Lymph Nodes on
Jin F; Qu B; Fu Z; Zhang Y; Han A; Kong L; Yu J
Clin Lung Cancer; 2018 Jan; 19(1):e101-e108. PubMed ID: 28690012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET parameters in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: predictive role for different survival endpoints and impact on prognostic stratification.
Chan SC; Chang JT; Lin CY; Ng SH; Wang HM; Liao CT; Chang CJ; Lin SY; Yen TC
Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Nov; 32(11):989-96. PubMed ID: 21862944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of baseline [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters MTV, TLG and asphericity in an international multicenter cohort of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Zschaeck S; Li Y; Lin Q; Beck M; Amthauer H; Bauersachs L; Hajiyianni M; Rogasch J; Ehrhardt VH; Kalinauskaite G; Weingärtner J; Hartmann V; van den Hoff J; Budach V; Stromberger C; Hofheinz F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236841. PubMed ID: 32730364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic utility of (18)F-FDG PET-CT performed prior to and during primary radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Index node is a useful prognostic imaging biomarker site.
Lin P; Min M; Lee M; Holloway L; Forstner D; Bray V; Xuan W; Chicco A; Fowler A
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Jul; 120(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 27321151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA and nodal maximal standard uptake values of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography improved prognostic stratification to predict distant metastasis for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Chen WH; Tang LQ; Zhang L; Chen QY; Guo SS; Liu LT; Fan W; Zhang X; Guo L; Zhao C; Cao KJ; Qian CN; Guo X; Xie D; Zeng MS; Mai HQ
Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(35):38296-307. PubMed ID: 26512922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pretreatment quantitative
Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of distant metastasis and survival in adenoid cystic carcinoma using quantitative
Lim WS; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Kim SJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Oral Oncol; 2018 Feb; 77():98-104. PubMed ID: 29362133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value on SUV-derived parameters assessed on
Liao X; Liu M; Li S; Huang W; Guo C; Liu J; Xiong Y; Zhang J; Fan Y; Wang R
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 37020286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on
Qiu X; Wu H; Xu T; Xie S; You Z; Hu Y; Zheng Y; Liang Z; Huang C; Yi L; Li L; Liu J; Fei Z; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2022 May; 22(1):495. PubMed ID: 35513804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of breast cancer recurrence using lymph node metabolic and volumetric parameters from
Kim YI; Kim YJ; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Lee DS; Chung JK; Kang KW
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Oct; 44(11):1787-1795. PubMed ID: 28616695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
