These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28008791)

  • 41. Detection limit of isotope dilution mass spectrometry.
    Yu LL; Fassett JD; Guthrie WF
    Anal Chem; 2002 Aug; 74(15):3887-91. PubMed ID: 12175180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets: I. Summary statistics.
    Antweiler RC; Taylor HE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(10):3732-8. PubMed ID: 18546715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cross calibration between XRF and ICP-MS for high spatial resolution analysis of ombrotrophic peat cores for palaeoclimatic studies.
    Poto L; Gabrieli J; Crowhurst S; Agostinelli C; Spolaor A; Cairns WR; Cozzi G; Barbante C
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Jan; 407(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 25404165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Chemometric approach to open validation protocols: Prediction of validation parameters in multi-residue ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods.
    Alladio E; Pirro V; Salomone A; Vincenti M; Leardi R
    Anal Chim Acta; 2015 Jun; 878():78-86. PubMed ID: 26002328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Model averaging quantiles from data censored by a limit of detection.
    Nysen R; Faes C; Ferrari P; Verger P; Aerts M
    Biom J; 2016 Mar; 58(2):331-56. PubMed ID: 26073769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sensitivity, Prediction Uncertainty, and Detection Limit for Artificial Neural Network Calibrations.
    Allegrini F; Olivieri AC
    Anal Chem; 2016 Aug; 88(15):7807-12. PubMed ID: 27363813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of methods for managing censored results when calculating the geometric mean.
    Mikkonen HG; Clarke BO; Dasika R; Wallis CJ; Reichman SM
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jan; 191():412-416. PubMed ID: 29049962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Estimating correlation with multiply censored data arising from the adjustment of singly censored data.
    Newton E; Rudel R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 17265951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Analysis of censored exposure data by constrained maximization of the Shapiro-Wilk W statistic.
    Flynn MR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 19955326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prediction models for clustered data with informative priors for the random effects: a simulation study.
    Ni H; Groenwold RHH; Nielen M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 30081875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Metabolomics variable selection and classification in the presence of observations below the detection limit using an extension of ERp.
    van Reenen M; Westerhuis JA; Reinecke CJ; Venter JH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 28153039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rapid and sensitive methodology for determination of ethyl carbamate in fortified wines using microextraction by packed sorbent and gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection.
    Leça JM; Pereira V; Pereira AC; Marques JC
    Anal Chim Acta; 2014 Feb; 811():29-35. PubMed ID: 24456591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accounting for undetected compounds in statistical analyses of mass spectrometry 'omic studies.
    Taylor SL; Leiserowitz GS; Kim K
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Dec; 12(6):703-22. PubMed ID: 24246290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. New algorithms for processing and peak detection in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry data.
    Hastings CA; Norton SM; Roy S
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2002; 16(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 11857732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Deviance residuals-based sparse PLS and sparse kernel PLS regression for censored data.
    Bastien P; Bertrand F; Meyer N; Maumy-Bertrand M
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 25286920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A multi-model statistical approach for proteomic spectral count quantitation.
    Branson OE; Freitas MA
    J Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 144():23-32. PubMed ID: 27260494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Recognizing drug-facilitated crimes: Detection and quantification of benzodiazepines in beverages using fast liquid-liquid extraction with low temperature partitioning and paper spray mass spectrometry.
    de Paula C; Jurisch M; Piccin E; Augusti R
    Drug Test Anal; 2018 Sep; 10(9):1348-1357. PubMed ID: 29663724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Feature selection and nearest centroid classification for protein mass spectrometry.
    Levner I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():68. PubMed ID: 15788095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error.
    Guo Y; Little RJ; McConnell DS
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 22157312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.