104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28009147)
1. Ten-year experience of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the road from cherry-picking to standard procedure.
Schiffmann J; Haese A; Boehm K; Salomon G; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 28009147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in Patient Characteristics Among Men Choosing Open or Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Contemporary Practice at a European High-Volume Center.
Schiffmann J; Haese A; Lenz J; Heinzer H; Salomon G; Steuber T; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Tennstedt P; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Int; 2016; 97(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26780655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.
Truesdale MD; Lee DJ; Cheetham PJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1055-60. PubMed ID: 20575697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Schiffmann J; Haese A; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Boehm K; Beyer B; Larcher A; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1547-53. PubMed ID: 26117216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.
Suardi N; Larcher A; Haese A; Ficarra V; Govorov A; Buffi NM; Walz J; Rocco B; Borghesi M; Steuber T; Pini G; Briganti A; Mottrie AM; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Pushkar D; Van Der Poel H;
Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24411992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [High-risk prostate cancer surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy].
Duperron C; Moulin M; Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Cormier L
Prog Urol; 2015 Jun; 25(7):390-5. PubMed ID: 25759079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the "post-dissemination" period.
Gandaglia G; Trinh QD; Hu JC; Schiffmann J; Becker A; Roghmann F; Popa I; Tian Z; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M; Abdollah F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1080-6. PubMed ID: 24411705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Drerup M; Herrmann J; Isbarn H; Beyer B;
World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 29427005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate of Symptomatic Lymphocele Formation After Extraperitoneal vs Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy.
Horovitz D; Lu X; Feng C; Messing EM; Joseph JV
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 28741376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilization of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Modi PK; Bock M; Kim S; Singer EA; Parikh RR
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e1001-e1006. PubMed ID: 28558990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of the introduction of a robotic training programme on prostate cancer stage migration at a single tertiary referral centre.
Briganti A; Bianchi M; Sun M; Suardi N; Gallina A; Abdollah F; Bertini R; Colombo R; Girolamo VD; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Karakiewicz PI; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(8):1222-30. PubMed ID: 23145532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomised non-inferiority trial of pelvic drain placement vs no pelvic drain placement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Chenam A; Yuh B; Zhumkhawala A; Ruel N; Chu W; Lau C; Chan K; Wilson T; Yamzon J
BJU Int; 2018 Mar; 121(3):357-364. PubMed ID: 28872774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting lymph node invasion in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Abdollah F; Klett DE; Sammon JD; Dalela D; Sood A; Hsu L; Diaz M; Gupta N; Peabody JO; Trinh QD; Menon M
Can J Urol; 2016 Feb; 23(1):8141-50. PubMed ID: 26892054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.
Yates J; Haleblian G; Stein B; Miller B; Renzulli J; Pareek G
Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4842-6. PubMed ID: 19796462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extended vs standard lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: a propensity-score-matching analysis.
Kim KH; Lim SK; Kim HY; Shin TY; Lee JY; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 23356436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The learning curve for laparoscopic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: implications for compliance with existing guidelines.
Eden CG; Zacharakis E; Bott S
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 23419154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of required nodal yield in a high risk cohort undergoing extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on functional outcomes.
Sagalovich D; Calaway A; Srivastava A; Sooriakumaran P; Tewari AK
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 22823452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing conventional laparoscopic to robotic-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection in men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis.
Albisinni S; Aoun F; LE Dinh D; Zanaty M; Hawaux E; Peltier A; VAN Velthoven R
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 28009151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 26667212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
