These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

871 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28011096)

  • 1. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
    Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy (mLPS-RH) vs laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy (LESS-RH) in early stage cervical cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
    Fagotti A; Ghezzi F; Boruta DM; Scambia G; Escobar P; Fader AN; Malzoni M; Fanfani F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 24768978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
    Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
    Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: initial multi-institutional experience for treatment of invasive cervical cancer.
    Boruta DM; Fagotti A; Bradford LS; Escobar PF; Scambia G; Kushnir CL; Michener CM; Fader AN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 24161887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
    Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
    Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regional trends of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and exploration of perioperative outcomes.
    Holtzman S; Chaoul J; Finkelstein M; Kolev V; Zakashansky K
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 77():102095. PubMed ID: 35078009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.