These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28011282)

  • 41. Single metal deposition versus physical developer: A comparison between two advanced fingermark detection techniques.
    Moret S; Lee PLT; de la Hunty M; Spindler X; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():103-112. PubMed ID: 30500490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The detection of latent fingermarks on porous surfaces using amino acid sensitive reagents: a review.
    Jelly R; Patton EL; Lennard C; Lewis SW; Lim KF
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Oct; 652(1-2):128-42. PubMed ID: 19786173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Preliminary evaluation of Solstice® PF as a replacement carrier solvent for Australian fingermark detection.
    Bouzin JT; Frick AA; Sauzier G; Lewis SW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Nov; 340():111465. PubMed ID: 36179445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Development of fingermarks on Latex gloves: The solution to a challenging surface.
    Arbeli T; Liptz Y; Bengiat R; Levin-Elad M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():147-152. PubMed ID: 29031159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Gamma irradiation as a biological decontaminant and its effect on common fingermark detection techniques and DNA profiling.
    Hoile R; Banos C; Colella M; Walsh SJ; Roux C
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 20002271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Visualising the past - An evaluation of processes and sequences for fingermark recovery from old documents.
    Bleay S; Fitzgerald L; Sears V; Kent T
    Sci Justice; 2019 Mar; 59(2):125-137. PubMed ID: 30798859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47.
    Olszowska-Łoś I; Ratajczyk T; Pieta IS; Siejca A; Niedziółka-Jönsson J; Leśniewski A
    Anal Chem; 2020 Dec; 92(23):15671-15678. PubMed ID: 33171042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Bioterrorism: processing contaminated evidence, the effects of formaldehyde gas on the recovery of latent fingermarks.
    Hoile R; Walsh SJ; Roux C
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1097-102. PubMed ID: 17767655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Production of artificial fingermarks. Part II - The use of a modified inkjet printer for the deposition of synthetic secretions.
    Steiner R; Moret S; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Sep; 350():111804. PubMed ID: 37536074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The compatibility of fingerprint visualization techniques with immunolabeling.
    van Dam A; Aalders MC; van Leeuwen TG; Lambrechts SA
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):999-1002. PubMed ID: 23682987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of a Hot Print System for the development of latent fingermarks on thermal paper: A pseudo-operational trial.
    Robb K; Deacon P; Fordyce L; Fennessy R; Farrugia KJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 Jan; 60(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 31924291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Use of an optimized 1,2-indanedione process for the development of latent prints*.
    Bicknell DE; Ramotowski RS
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1108-16. PubMed ID: 18637975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Substituted naphthoquinones as novel amino acid sensitive reagents for the detection of latent fingermarks on paper surfaces.
    Jelly R; Lewis SW; Lennard C; Lim KF; Almog J
    Talanta; 2010 Oct; 82(5):1717-24. PubMed ID: 20875568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An investigation into the enhancement of fingermarks in blood on fruit and vegetables.
    Rae L; Gentles D; Farrugia KJ
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 23937941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The quantification of fingerprint quality using a relative contrast index.
    Humphreys JD; Porter G; Bell M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jun; 178(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 18359590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Latent fingerprint detection on porous surfaces by DFO--a practice-orientated approach].
    Schwarz L; Beisel M
    Arch Kriminol; 2010; 225(3-4):81-9. PubMed ID: 20506707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An evaluation of the effect of incorporating metal salts into 1,8 diazafluoren-9-one (DFO) formulations for fingermark enhancement.
    Mayse K; Sears VG; Nicolasora N; Bleay S
    Sci Justice; 2019 May; 59(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 31054824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Production of artificial fingermarks. Part I - Synthetic secretions formulation.
    Steiner R; Roux C; Moret S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Feb; 331():111166. PubMed ID: 34973483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Determining the effects of routine fingermark detection techniques on the subsequent recovery and analysis of explosive residues on various substrates.
    King S; Benson S; Kelly T; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):257-64. PubMed ID: 24314527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reagents for the chemical development of latent fingerprints: scope and limitations of benzo[f]ninhydrin in comparison to ninhydrin.
    Almog J; Sears VG; Springer E; Hewlett DF; Walker S; Wiesner S; Lidor R; Bahar E
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 May; 45(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 10855956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.