440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28011448)
1. Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials.
Perlmutter AS; Tran VT; Dechartres A; Ravaud P
Ann Oncol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 28011448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 28757260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.
Shepshelovich D; Goldvaser H; Wang L; Abdul Razak AR; Bedard PL
Invest New Drugs; 2017 Dec; 35(6):827-833. PubMed ID: 28905282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of reporting phase III randomized controlled trials of antibiotic treatment for common bacterial infections in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.
Shepshelovich D; Yelin D; Gafter-Gvili A; Goldman S; Avni T; Yahav D
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Nov; 24(11):1211.e9-1211.e14. PubMed ID: 29454846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inconsistent Reporting Between Meta-analysis Protocol and Publication - A Cross-Sectional Study.
Delgado AF; Delgado AF
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5101-5107. PubMed ID: 28870940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.
Jones CW; Keil LG; Holland WC; Caughey MC; Platts-Mills TF
BMC Med; 2015 Nov; 13():282. PubMed ID: 26581191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials.
Krsticevic M; Saric D; Saric F; Slapnicar E; Boric K; Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Kegalj MJ; Puljak L
J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Nov; 8(15):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 31739691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Consistency of trial reporting between ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications: one decade after FDAAA.
Talebi R; Redberg RF; Ross JS
Trials; 2020 Jul; 21(1):675. PubMed ID: 32703252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deficiencies in health-related quality-of-life assessment and reporting: a systematic review of oncology randomized phase III trials published between 2012 and 2016.
Marandino L; La Salvia A; Sonetto C; De Luca E; Pignataro D; Zichi C; Di Stefano RF; Ghisoni E; Lombardi P; Mariniello A; Reale ML; Trevisi E; Leone G; Muratori L; Marcato M; Bironzo P; Novello S; Aglietta M; Scagliotti GV; Perrone F; Di Maio M
Ann Oncol; 2018 Dec; 29(12):2288-2295. PubMed ID: 30304498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.
Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Oncology Trial Results Reporting Over a 10-Year Period.
Liu X; Zhang Y; Li WF; Vokes E; Sun Y; Le QT; Ma J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e2110438. PubMed ID: 34028549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology.
Raghav KP; Mahajan S; Yao JC; Hobbs BP; Berry DA; Pentz RD; Tam A; Hong WK; Ellis LM; Abbruzzese J; Overman MJ
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(31):3583-90. PubMed ID: 26304898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical trials on drug-drug interactions registered in ClinicalTrials.gov reported incongruent safety data in published articles: an observational study.
Jurić D; Pranić S; Tokalić R; Milat AM; Mudnić I; Pavličević I; Marušić A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():35-45. PubMed ID: 30081071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome Reporting Bias in Clinical Trials Researching Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.
Lemmens CMC; van Amerongen S; Strijbis EM; Killestein J
Neurology; 2024 Mar; 102(6):e208032. PubMed ID: 38408286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrepancies in endpoints between clinical trial protocols and clinical trial registration in randomized trials in oncology.
Serpas VJ; Raghav KP; Halperin DM; Yao J; Overman MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):169. PubMed ID: 30541475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Tinnitus Trials: Comparison of Trial Registries With Corresponding Publications.
van Beurden I; van de Beek MJ; van Heteren JAA; Smit AL; Stegeman I
Front Neurol; 2021; 12():669501. PubMed ID: 34177776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Baudart M; Ravaud P; Baron G; Dechartres A; Haneef R; Boutron I
BMC Med; 2016 Jan; 14():7. PubMed ID: 26819213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of serious adverse events posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in corresponding journal articles.
Tang E; Ravaud P; Riveros C; Perrodeau E; Dechartres A
BMC Med; 2015 Aug; 13():189. PubMed ID: 26269118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]