These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28011802)

  • 1. Novel electrocardiographic dyssynchrony criteria improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Vereckei A; Szelényi Z; Kutyifa V; Zima E; Szénási G; Kiss M; Katona G; Karádi I; Merkely B
    Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 28011802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QRS frequency characteristics help predict response to cardiac resynchronization in left bundle branch block less than 150 milliseconds.
    Niebauer MJ; Rickard J; Polakof L; Tchou PJ; Varma N
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Dec; 11(12):2183-9. PubMed ID: 25068573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Risum N
    Dan Med J; 2014 Dec; 61(12):B4981. PubMed ID: 25441737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy by normalization of QRS duration to left ventricular dimension.
    Zweerink A; Wu L; de Roest GJ; Nijveldt R; de Cock CC; van Rossum AC; Allaart CP
    Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1508-1513. PubMed ID: 27707784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.
    Engels EB; Végh EM; Van Deursen CJ; Vernooy K; Singh JP; Prinzen FW
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 25230363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction of Left Ventricular Size and Sex on Outcome of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With a Narrow QRS Duration in the EchoCRT Trial.
    Varma N; Sogaard P; Bax JJ; Abraham WT; Borer JS; Dickstein K; Singh JP; Gras D; Holzmeister J; Brugada J; Ruschitzka F
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 May; 7(11):. PubMed ID: 29807890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early Changes in QRS Frequency Following Cardiac Resynchronization Predict Hemodynamic Response in Left Bundle Branch Block Patients.
    Niebauer MJ; Rickard J; Tchou PJ; Varma N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 May; 27(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 26824741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical Substrates Driving Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Combined Clinical-Computational Evaluation.
    Huntjens PR; Ploux S; Strik M; Walmsley J; Ritter P; Haissaguerre M; Prinzen FW; Delhaas T; Lumens J; Bordachar P
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e005647. PubMed ID: 29654125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive electrocardiographic mapping to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy: beyond QRS duration and left bundle branch block morphology.
    Ploux S; Lumens J; Whinnett Z; Montaudon M; Strom M; Ramanathan C; Derval N; Zemmoura A; Denis A; De Guillebon M; Shah A; Hocini M; Jaïs P; Ritter P; Haïssaguerre M; Wilkoff BL; Bordachar P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 61(24):2435-2443. PubMed ID: 23602768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heart Size Difference Drives Sex-Specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the MORE-MPP CRT Trial.
    Wijesuriya N; Mehta V; De Vere F; Howell S; Niederer SA; Burri H; Sperzel J; Calo L; Thibault B; Lin W; Lee K; Grammatico A; Varma N; Gwechenberger M; Leclercq C; Rinaldi CA
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Jun; 13(12):e035279. PubMed ID: 38879456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reverse electrical remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy: prevalence and clinical impact.
    Sebag FA; Martins RP; Defaye P; Hidden-Lucet F; Mabo P; Daubert JC; Leclercq C
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1219-27. PubMed ID: 22697464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of dyssynchrony in the prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Sohal M; Duckett SG; Zhuang X; Shi W; Ginks M; Shetty A; Sammut E; Kozerke S; Niederer S; Smith N; Ourselin S; Rinaldi CA; Rueckert D; Carr-White G; Razavi R
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Aug; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 25084814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ECG in cardiac resynchronization therapy: influence of left and right ventricular preactivation and relation to acute response.
    Bogaard MD; Hesselink T; Meine M; Loh P; Hauer RN; Cramer MJ; Doevendans PA; Tuinenburg AE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1237-45. PubMed ID: 22734629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiating Electromechanical From Non-Electrical Substrates of Mechanical Discoordination to Identify Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Lumens J; Tayal B; Walmsley J; Delgado-Montero A; Huntjens PR; Schwartzman D; Althouse AD; Delhaas T; Prinzen FW; Gorcsan J
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):e003744. PubMed ID: 26338877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new simplified electrocardiographic score predicts clinical outcome in patients treated with CRT.
    Végh EM; Kandala J; Januszkiewicz L; Ren J; Miller A; Orencole M; Blendea D; Merkely B; Gellér L; Singh JP; Borgquist R
    Europace; 2018 Mar; 20(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 28160485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ventricular geometry-regularized QRSd predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy response: machine learning from crosstalk between electrocardiography and echocardiography.
    Lei J; Wang YG; Bhatta L; Ahmed J; Fan D; Wang J; Liu K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 31104177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usefulness of notched duration to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Balci MM; Balci KG; Sen F; Maden O; Unal S; Selcuk MT; Selcuk H
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2015 Aug; 49(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 25920477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probability and magnitude of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to QRS duration and gender in nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB.
    Varma N; Manne M; Nguyen D; He J; Niebauer M; Tchou P
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Jul; 11(7):1139-47. PubMed ID: 24704570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Myocardial viability as shown by left ventricular lead pacing threshold and improved dyssynchrony by QRS narrowing predicts the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Takenaka M; Inden Y; Yanagisawa S; Fujii A; Ando M; Funabiki J; Murase Y; Otake N; Sakamoto Y; Shibata R; Murohara T
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 30516312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating strict and conventional left bundle branch block criteria using electrocardiographic simulations.
    Galeotti L; van Dam PM; Loring Z; Chan D; Strauss DG
    Europace; 2013 Dec; 15(12):1816-21. PubMed ID: 23703366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.