These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28011839)
1. Patient-specific modeling of left ventricular electromechanics as a driver for haemodynamic analysis. Augustin CM; Crozier A; Neic A; Prassl AJ; Karabelas E; Ferreira da Silva T; Fernandes JF; Campos F; Kuehne T; Plank G Europace; 2016 Dec; 18(suppl 4):iv121-iv129. PubMed ID: 28011839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards a Computational Framework for Modeling the Impact of Aortic Coarctations Upon Left Ventricular Load. Karabelas E; Gsell MAF; Augustin CM; Marx L; Neic A; Prassl AJ; Goubergrits L; Kuehne T; Plank G Front Physiol; 2018; 9():538. PubMed ID: 29892227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elimination of Transcoarctation Pressure Gradients Has No Impact on Left Ventricular Function or Aortic Shear Stress After Intervention in Patients With Mild Coarctation. Keshavarz-Motamed Z; Rikhtegar Nezami F; Partida RA; Nakamura K; Staziaki PV; Ben-Assa E; Ghoshhajra B; Bhatt AB; Edelman ER JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 9(18):1953-65. PubMed ID: 27659574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of 3D rotational angiography to perform computational fluid dynamics and virtual interventions in aortic coarctation. Armstrong AK; Zampi JD; Itu LM; Benson LN Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 31609061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance compatible physical model of the left ventricle for multi-modality characterization of wall motion and hemodynamics. Okafor IU; Santhanakrishnan A; Chaffins BD; Mirabella L; Oshinski JN; Yoganathan AP J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Jun; 17(1):51. PubMed ID: 26112155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Cardiac Motion on Aortic Valve Flow Used in Computational Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta. Wendell DC; Samyn MM; Cava JR; Krolikowski MM; LaDisa JF J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910011-09100111. PubMed ID: 27367143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transthoracic 3D echocardiographic left heart chamber quantification in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease. van den Hoven AT; Mc-Ghie JS; Chelu RG; Duijnhouwer AL; Baggen VJM; Coenen A; Vletter WB; Dijkshoorn ML; van den Bosch AE; Roos-Hesselink JW Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1895-1903. PubMed ID: 28631106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty Quantification for Non-invasive Assessment of Pressure Drop Across a Coarctation of the Aorta Using CFD. Brüning J; Hellmeier F; Yevtushenko P; Kühne T; Goubergrits L Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):582-596. PubMed ID: 30284186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional thoracic aorta principal strain analysis from routine ECG-gated computerized tomography: feasibility in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Satriano A; Guenther Z; White JA; Merchant N; Di Martino ES; Al-Qoofi F; Lydell CP; Fine NM BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2018 May; 18(1):76. PubMed ID: 29720088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment, treatment outcome prediction and follow-up of aortic coarctation from MR imaging. Ralovich K; Itu L; Vitanovski D; Sharma P; Ionasec R; Mihalef V; Krawtschuk W; Zheng Y; Everett A; Pongiglione G; Leonardi B; Ringel R; Navab N; Heimann T; Comaniciu D Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2143-56. PubMed ID: 25979009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of Aortic Valve Closure Artifact During Outflow Tract Mapping: Correlation With Hemodynamics and Mechanical Valves. Romero J; Ajijola O; Shivkumar K; Tung R Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28630170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Invasive hemodynamic evaluation in patients with mechanical aortic valves. Kiefer TL; Wang A; Harrison JK Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 23345088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemodynamic Evaluation of a Biological and Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis Using Patient-Specific MRI-Based CFD. Hellmeier F; Nordmeyer S; Yevtushenko P; Bruening J; Berger F; Kuehne T; Goubergrits L; Kelm M Artif Organs; 2018 Jan; 42(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 28853220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New insights from a computational model on the relation between pacing site and CRT response. Pluijmert M; Bovendeerd PH; Lumens J; Vernooy K; Prinzen FW; Delhaas T Europace; 2016 Dec; 18(suppl 4):iv94-iv103. PubMed ID: 28011836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-specific assessment of hemodynamics by computational fluid dynamics in patients with bicuspid aortopathy. Kimura N; Nakamura M; Komiya K; Nishi S; Yamaguchi A; Tanaka O; Misawa Y; Adachi H; Kawahito K J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Apr; 153(4):S52-S62.e3. PubMed ID: 28190607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational fluid dynamic study of hemodynamic effects on aortic root blood flow of systematically varied left ventricular assist device graft anastomosis design. Callington A; Long Q; Mohite P; Simon A; Mittal TK J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 150(3):696-704. PubMed ID: 26092505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Left ventricular response to pressure afterload in children: aortic stenosis and coarctation: a systematic review of the current evidence. Jashari H; Rydberg A; Ibrahimi P; Bajraktari G; Henein MY Int J Cardiol; 2015 Jan; 178():203-9. PubMed ID: 25464254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the outcome of transcatheter mitral valve implantation using image-based computational models. Alharbi Y; Otton J; Muller DWM; Geelan-Small P; Lovell NH; Al Abed A; Dokos S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(4):335-342. PubMed ID: 31862348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comprehensive MR Analysis of Cardiac Function, Aortic Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular Strain in Pediatric Cohort with Isolated Bicuspid Aortic Valve. Stefek HA; Berhane H; Robinson JD; Reilly B; Ruh A; Markl M; Rigsby CK Pediatr Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 40(7):1450-1459. PubMed ID: 31342116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers. Rengier F; Delles M; Eichhorn J; Azad YJ; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 31(4):823-30. PubMed ID: 25645544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]