147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28012285)
41. Randomized clinical trial comparing two vessel-sealing devices with crush clamping during liver transection.
Ichida A; Hasegawa K; Takayama T; Kudo H; Sakamoto Y; Yamazaki S; Midorikawa Y; Higaki T; Matsuyama Y; Kokudo N
Br J Surg; 2016 Dec; 103(13):1795-1803. PubMed ID: 27682642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. BiClamp(®) forceps was significantly superior to conventional suture ligation in radical abdominal hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study in 391 cases.
Li L; Qie MR; Wang XL; Huang J; Zhang Q; Li DQ; He YD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Aug; 286(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 22456787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Debakey forceps crushing technique for hepatic parenchymal transection in liver surgery: a review of 100 cases and ergonomic advantages.
Jain S; Sharma B; Kaushik M; Jain L
HPB Surg; 2014; 2014():861829. PubMed ID: 25009367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Safety and Efficacy of a New Bipolar Energy Device for Parenchymal Dissection in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.
Dural C; Akyuz M; Yazici P; Aksoy E; Aucejo F; Quintini C; Miller C; Fung J; Berber E
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Feb; 26(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 26836626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Impact of energy devices during liver parenchymal transection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Gotohda N; Yamanaka T; Saiura A; Uesaka K; Hashimoto M; Konishi M; Shimada K
World J Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 25637271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Role of ultrasonically activated scalpel in hepatic resection: a comparison with conventional blunt dissection.
Sugo H; Matsumoto K; Kojima K; Fukasawa M; Beppu T
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(61):173-5. PubMed ID: 15783022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Preliminary report on surgical technique in hepatic parenchymal transection for liver tumors in the elderly: a lesson learned from living-related liver transplantation.
Gruttadauria S; Doria C; Vitale CH; Cintorino D; Foglieni CS; Fung JJ; Marino IR
J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 88(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 15565600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Radiofrequency-assisted versus clamp-crush liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiao WK; Chen D; Hu AB; Peng BG; Guo YZ; Fu SJ; Liang LJ; Li SQ
J Surg Res; 2014 Apr; 187(2):471-83. PubMed ID: 24290429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Experience with a simple clamp-crush technique devoid of other devices for liver resections in a surgical oncology practice.
Schwarz RE
Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):503-8. PubMed ID: 25557971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing intermittent portal triad clamping versus ischemic preconditioning with continuous clamping for major liver resection.
Petrowsky H; McCormack L; Trujillo M; Selzner M; Jochum W; Clavien PA
Ann Surg; 2006 Dec; 244(6):921-8; discussion 928-30. PubMed ID: 17122617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The role of the ultrasonically activated shears and vascular cutting stapler in hepatic resection.
Wrightson WR; Edwards MJ; McMasters KM
Am Surg; 2000 Nov; 66(11):1037-40. PubMed ID: 11090014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Radiofrequency-assisted liver resection with a comb-shaped bipolar device versus clamp crushing: a clinical study.
Galizia G; Castellano P; Pinto M; Zamboli A; Orditura M; De Vita F; Pignatelli C; Lieto E
Surg Innov; 2012 Dec; 19(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 22170895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A prospective evaluation of ultrasonic dissector plus harmonic scalpel in liver resection.
Arru M; Pulitanò C; Aldrighetti L; Catena M; Finazzi R; Ferla G
Am Surg; 2007 Mar; 73(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 17375782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. BiClamp-Fracture Method in Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: Verifying its Efficacy Irrespective of Liver Stiffness.
Uchiyama H; Morita K; Itoh S; Takenaka K; Maehara Y
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Aug; 25(4):e113-6. PubMed ID: 26121542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Hepatectomy using traditional Péan clamp-crushing technique under intermittent Pringle maneuver.
Ishizaki Y; Yoshimoto J; Sugo H; Miwa K; Kawasaki S
Am J Surg; 2008 Sep; 196(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 18558388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effectiveness of LigaSure diathermy coagulation in liver surgery.
Chiappa A; Bertani E; Biffi R; Zbar AP; Viale G; Pruneri G; Bellomi M; Venturino M; Andreoni B
Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():33-8. PubMed ID: 18802881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Usefulness of the combination procedure of crash clamping and vessel sealing for hepatic resection.
Nanashima A; Tobinaga S; Abo T; Nonaka T; Sawai T; Nagayasu T
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Aug; 102(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 20648591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Laparoscopic liver resection using radiofrequency coagulation.
Hompes D; Aerts R; Penninckx F; Topal B
Surg Endosc; 2007 Feb; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 17122980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Clamp-crushing vs. radiofrequency-assisted liver resection:changes in liver function tests.
Palibrk I; Milicic B; Stojiljkovic L; Manojlovic N; Dugalic V; Bumbasirevic V; Kalezic N; Zuvela M; Milicevic M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 May; 59(115):800-4. PubMed ID: 22020915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Anterior approach versus conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Liu CL; Fan ST; Cheung ST; Lo CM; Ng IO; Wong J
Ann Surg; 2006 Aug; 244(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 16858181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
