These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28012434)

  • 1. Fixations to the eyes aids in facial encoding; covertly attending to the eyes does not.
    Laidlaw KE; Kingstone A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Feb; 173():55-65. PubMed ID: 28012434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention to the face is characterised by a difficult to inhibit first fixation to the eyes.
    Thompson SJ; Foulsham T; Leekam SR; Jones CRG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():229-238. PubMed ID: 30690268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential impact of disfiguring facial features on overt and covert attention.
    Boutsen L; Pearson NA; Jüttner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():122-134. PubMed ID: 30103152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new look at social attention: orienting to the eyes is not (entirely) under volitional control.
    Laidlaw KE; Risko EF; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1132-43. PubMed ID: 22686696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Free viewing of talking faces reveals mouth and eye preferring regions of the human superior temporal sulcus.
    Rennig J; Beauchamp MS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():25-36. PubMed ID: 30092347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Don't be fooled! Attentional responses to social cues in a face-to-face and video magic trick reveals greater top-down control for overt than covert attention.
    Kuhn G; Teszka R; Tenaw N; Kingstone A
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():136-42. PubMed ID: 26407341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial emotion recognition and eye movement behaviour in conduct disorder.
    Martin-Key NA; Graf EW; Adams WJ; Fairchild G
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2018 Mar; 59(3):247-257. PubMed ID: 28881001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overt and covert attention shifts to emotional faces: Combining EEG, eye tracking, and a go/no-go paradigm.
    Kulke L; Brümmer L; Pooresmaeili A; Schacht A
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Aug; 58(8):e13838. PubMed ID: 33983655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional mechanisms in judging genuine and fake smiles: eye-movement patterns.
    Calvo MG; Gutiérrez-García A; Avero P; Lundqvist D
    Emotion; 2013 Aug; 13(4):792-802. PubMed ID: 23627721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
    Boutet I; Lemieux CL; Goulet MA; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Covert shifts of attention can account for the functional role of "eye movements to nothing".
    Scholz A; Klichowicz A; Krems JF
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):230-243. PubMed ID: 28975576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eyes only? Perceiving eye contact is neither sufficient nor necessary for attentional capture by face direction.
    Böckler A; van der Wel RP; Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():134-40. PubMed ID: 26245915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Slowing down the flow of facial information enhances facial scanning in children with autism spectrum disorders: A pilot eye tracking study].
    Charrier A; Tardif C; Gepner B
    Encephale; 2017 Feb; 43(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 26995150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complementary effects of gaze direction and early saliency in guiding fixations during free viewing.
    Borji A; Parks D; Itti L
    J Vis; 2014 Nov; 14(13):3. PubMed ID: 25371549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is having similar eye movement patterns during face learning and recognition beneficial for recognition performance? Evidence from hidden Markov modeling.
    Chuk T; Chan AB; Hsiao JH
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():204-216. PubMed ID: 28435123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intact attentional orienting towards inverted faces revealed by both manual responses and eye-movement measurement in individuals with Williams syndrome.
    Hirai M; Muramatsu Y; Mizuno S; Kurahashi N; Kurahashi H; Nakamura M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Oct; 60(10):969-81. PubMed ID: 27476718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restricted attention to social cues in schizophrenia patients.
    Nikolaides A; Miess S; Auvera I; Müller R; Klosterkötter J; Ruhrmann S
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 266(7):649-61. PubMed ID: 27305925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movements and retinotopic tuning in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Peterson MF; Zaun I; Hoke H; Jiahui G; Duchaine B; Kanwisher N
    J Vis; 2019 Aug; 19(9):7. PubMed ID: 31426085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaze behavior to faces during dyadic interaction.
    Hessels RS; Cornelissen THW; Hooge ITC; Kemner C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):226-242. PubMed ID: 28604032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social and attention-to-detail subclusters of autistic traits differentially predict looking at eyes and face identity recognition ability.
    Davis J; McKone E; Zirnsak M; Moore T; O'Kearney R; Apthorp D; Palermo R
    Br J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 108(1):191-219. PubMed ID: 26988108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.